Some new hills for the next version

Ideas and suggestions for improving DSJ3.
mis
Posts: 88
Joined: 21 Feb 2008, 19:21
Location: Helsinki

Post by mis »

My only wish is that Serbia HS69 is the absolute minimum.

Already now it is almost better to fall in that hill to pass through with q* in a cup with a big amount of participants. In fact easier than jumping normally if you are a little unlucky with stylepoints. :oops:
Jose_Bach
Posts: 348
Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 22:45
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Jose_Bach »

At least no more hills in online cup... 40 hills is enough. Maybe Jussi could do more hills to offline jumping, but in online cup we jump 40 hills.
kisiel
Posts: 31
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 21:21
Location: Poland

Post by kisiel »

I, in turn, suggests that they are in some countries after 2 or more for example:
Russia (Kaliningrad) - HS 50
Poland (Wisla) - HS 240
Czech Republic (Planica) - HS 300

Also proposed:
Kosovo - HS 90
Portugal - HS 135
Liechtenstein - HS 245
Iceland (if not the country) - HS 75
South Africa - HS 200
Luxembourg - HS 30
Greece - HS 500
Azerbaijan - HS 150
F.Y.R Macedonia - HS 110
Turkey - HS 81

After that I support the majority of these proposals off. On the occasion of the increase suggests that the hill but this was more jumps in the demo version.
EgyLynx
Posts: 425
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 21:38
Location: Finish "Manse"

Post by EgyLynx »

Greece - HS 500 you must joking...
TPo
Posts: 549
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Location: Finland

Post by TPo »

kisiel wrote:I, in turn, suggests that they are in some countries after 2 or more for example:
Czech Republic (Planica) - HS 300
FAIL.
kisiel
Posts: 31
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 21:21
Location: Poland

Post by kisiel »

And how do you assess the rest of the ideas for jumps ?
sandvik
Posts: 37
Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 17:14

Post by sandvik »

At least we now need a norwegian hill K215 :)
TPo
Posts: 549
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Location: Finland

Post by TPo »

kisiel wrote:And how do you assess the rest of the ideas for jumps ?
Heh.. I just mean, Planica is Slovenia, not Czech Republic :D
kisiel
Posts: 31
Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 21:21
Location: Poland

Post by kisiel »

In that case, I apologize for this mistake - it is really Planica, Slovenia.
Roman Fendt
Posts: 48
Joined: 04 Apr 2010, 16:29

Post by Roman Fendt »

Man HS 500 is ridicolous, nooo way, even if it would be nice to jump at least 400 m.
I think that nepal stuff sounds great K270 HS298.... and I think there is no way to jump a HS40 if the jumping physics are not totally changed....at least HS60
and I think that it should be possible to create you skis with some structures (like wood ,mormor, steel) it would look awesome.
smithdwsn
Posts: 4
Joined: 27 May 2010, 22:14

Post by smithdwsn »

Here my list which i use:
- Brazil HS 72
- South Africa HS 188
- West Sahara HS-500
- Brazil HS 75
Adam Barej
Posts: 3
Joined: 07 Apr 2010, 16:18
Location: Poland

Post by Adam Barej »

Maybe Uzbekistan HS 45
pywy25
Posts: 24
Joined: 18 May 2010, 13:24
Location: Poland

Post by pywy25 »

And maybe Mars HS783,5? :roll:
I think there shouldn't be such hills as Argentina, Australia, Spain etc. because in these countries no one heard about ski jumping... I think that's a good idea to make 2 hills for one country.
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3865
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Jussi Koskela »

pywy25 wrote:And maybe Mars HS783,5? :roll:
I think there shouldn't be such hills as Argentina, Australia, Spain etc. because in these countries no one heard about ski jumping... I think that's a good idea to make 2 hills for one country.
Actually there is (or has been) at least one ski jumping hill in all of these countries.
http://www.skisprungschanzen.com/e_schanzen.htm
Roman Fendt
Posts: 48
Joined: 04 Apr 2010, 16:29

Post by Roman Fendt »

One question for Jussi, will you keep the several hillsizes in DSJ4 or will all the hills totally be changed in graphic AND dates? (hillsize/k-point...)
greets
Post Reply