HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Ideas and suggestions for improving DSJ4.
Post Reply

Which hill would you like to see in a February/March release ? (choose 3)

Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS89
18
5%
Hinterzarten HS77
17
5%
Hinterzarten HS108
55
15%
Kuopio HS100
9
2%
Lahti HS97
33
9%
Oberstdorf HS137 (tower omitted)
97
27%
Oslo HS106
54
15%
Pragelato HS106
7
2%
Pragelato HS140
53
14%
Sapporo HS100
23
6%
 
Total votes: 366
MikesCZ
Posts: 367
Joined: 19 Feb 2012, 14:18

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by MikesCZ »

This game is already very realistic, way ahead of all other ski jumping based games and these minor changes that will not improve anything in this game besides besides eye-candy effect are useless....sure it would be nice, but should Jussi really spend time on eye-candy in-game objects instead of doing more hills and improving more important things? I don't think so
Name: Michal Kala
Nation: CZE

Support the game - buy it and come join us online!
Top
Georg Gasser
Posts: 307
Joined: 07 Sep 2013, 12:32

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by Georg Gasser »

I see now Hinterzarten is now at place 2 with 17% what about that hill :D
Image
Top
Maciejo-96
Posts: 1656
Joined: 17 Aug 2012, 13:34
Contact:
Contact Maciejo-96

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by Maciejo-96 »

Jussi, maybe good will be moving a tower to the same level as a highest place on a inrun? :)

And I have idea about gates to use in World Cup mode with more infos (counted by me):
Gate 5, 89.1 km/h, 2.5 m/s, 143.0 m
Gate 15, 92.5 km/h; -2.5 m/s, 123.0 m
Top
Pavlokox
Posts: 135
Joined: 02 Nov 2011, 14:13
Location: Katowice, Poland

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by Pavlokox »

What is currently state about new version?
HVAC Engineer,
Senior Process Specialist with German at PwC
Top
J.MIRO
Posts: 852
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 11:16
Location: POLAND

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by J.MIRO »

Dont forgot about Falun, Jussi have permission for two new hills and after first ski jumps here, this should be in DSJ.
Top
AlexRollercoaster
Posts: 210
Joined: 28 Jan 2012, 13:15
Location: Germany

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by AlexRollercoaster »

J.MIRO wrote:Dont forgot about Falun, Jussi have permission for two new hills and after first ski jumps here, this should be in DSJ.
Yep +1
Top
akkarbelling
Posts: 233
Joined: 16 Feb 2011, 19:30

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by akkarbelling »

Falun would be nice to see in the game
Top
MattyPolz14
Posts: 184
Joined: 04 Apr 2012, 10:06
Location: Canada

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by MattyPolz14 »

Whistler hills. Enough said.
Top
NiklasMüller
Posts: 9
Joined: 26 Jan 2014, 18:44

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by NiklasMüller »

What is with Planica HS 139 and HS 104
Top
dddr
Posts: 28
Joined: 18 Jan 2014, 22:14

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by dddr »

Titise neustadt and insbruck
Top
Tonio94
Posts: 49
Joined: 15 Aug 2009, 15:08

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by Tonio94 »

Copper Peak :D
Top
dddr
Posts: 28
Joined: 18 Jan 2014, 22:14

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by dddr »

SZczyrk i Seefeld
Top
J.MIRO
Posts: 852
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 11:16
Location: POLAND

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by J.MIRO »

I think the best option for next version is Falun complex + one of normal hills like Lahti, Kuopio, Sapporo, Oslo or Hinterzarten.
Top
akkarbelling
Posts: 233
Joined: 16 Feb 2011, 19:30

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by akkarbelling »

J.MIRO wrote:I think the best option for next version is Falun complex + one of normal hills like Lahti, Kuopio, Sapporo, Oslo or Hinterzarten.
X2
Top
NiklasMüller
Posts: 9
Joined: 26 Jan 2014, 18:44

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by NiklasMüller »

Lahti HS 97 is not 97 but the real HS is 100
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Ideas & Suggestions”