HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
"Jussi Koskela wrote:
Here's the list of remaining hills that I have been able to get permissions for:
Bischofshofen HS78
Falun HS106 (under construction)
Falun HS134 (under construction)
Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS89
Hinterzarten HS77
Hinterzarten HS108
Klingenthal HS140
Kuopio HS100
Lahti HS97
Oberstdorf HS137 (view blocked)
Oslo HS106
Oslo HS134 (view blocked)
Park City HS100
Park City HS134
Pragelato HS106
Pragelato HS140
Sapporo HS100"
Please choose three hills what in your opinion must be in 1.5 version.
Here's the list of remaining hills that I have been able to get permissions for:
Bischofshofen HS78
Falun HS106 (under construction)
Falun HS134 (under construction)
Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS89
Hinterzarten HS77
Hinterzarten HS108
Klingenthal HS140
Kuopio HS100
Lahti HS97
Oberstdorf HS137 (view blocked)
Oslo HS106
Oslo HS134 (view blocked)
Park City HS100
Park City HS134
Pragelato HS106
Pragelato HS140
Sapporo HS100"
Please choose three hills what in your opinion must be in 1.5 version.
Peak: 1835
Total length offline: 3535.16 m
Total length online: 3500.20 m
Former online world record holder: Wisła.
Former offline world record holder in Oberstdorf! First jumper ever who broke and stood 230 meters barrier!
Total length offline: 3535.16 m
Total length online: 3500.20 m
Former online world record holder: Wisła.
Former offline world record holder in Oberstdorf! First jumper ever who broke and stood 230 meters barrier!
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Jussi Planica HS139 Bloudkova Velikanka you have permission?
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 23 Sep 2013, 14:20
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Park City HS134
Hinterzarten HS108
Klingenthal HS140
Hinterzarten HS108
Klingenthal HS140
-
- Posts: 902
- Joined: 10 Apr 2011, 21:28
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Bischofshofen HS78
Klingenthal HS140
Pragelato HS140
Klingenthal HS140
Pragelato HS140
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Lahti HS 97
Klingenthal HS 140
Park City HS 134
Klingenthal HS 140
Park City HS 134
Peak: 1835
Total length offline: 3535.16 m
Total length online: 3500.20 m
Former online world record holder: Wisła.
Former offline world record holder in Oberstdorf! First jumper ever who broke and stood 230 meters barrier!
Total length offline: 3535.16 m
Total length online: 3500.20 m
Former online world record holder: Wisła.
Former offline world record holder in Oberstdorf! First jumper ever who broke and stood 230 meters barrier!
-
- Posts: 304
- Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 12:10
- Location: Linz, Austria
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
i don't like small hills - so i chose the 3 "big" ones:
Klingenthal
Park City
Pragelato
Klingenthal
Park City
Pragelato
###fu**ing cheaters!!!###
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
So Klinghental for 100% in next version, than Park City HS134 and Hinterzarten HS108, maybe Bischofshofen HS78. For me - not bad.
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
We have 11 large hills, I want more small hills.
Bischofshofen HS78, Lahti HS97, Sapporo HS100
Bischofshofen HS78, Lahti HS97, Sapporo HS100
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: 04 Apr 2012, 10:06
- Location: Canada
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
PLEASE PARK CITY HILLS!!!!! I jump them all the time in real life and would love to have them in the game. Also Jussi, if you make them, could you please design te summer plastic like in real life? (see below)
http://www.panoramio.com/m/photo/2844458
http://www.panoramio.com/m/photo/2844458
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
And don't you want guys GaPa with its special and recognizable green tower?
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 14 Feb 2007, 14:29
- Location: Finland
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
X2domi_deluxe wrote:i don't like small hills - so i chose the 3 "big" ones:
Klingenthal
Park City
Pragelato

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
In my opinion DSJ4 needs more non-european hills and hills wnich have old, not regular profile. Thats why I voted for Lahti HS97, Park City HS134 and Sapporo HS100.
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: 04 Apr 2012, 10:06
- Location: Canada
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Park City HS134 is regular profile, I mean it may be 11 years old but it is still regular profile.J.MIRO wrote:In my opinion DSJ4 needs more non-european hills and hills wnich have old, not regular profile. Thats why I voted for Lahti HS97, Park City HS134 and Sapporo HS100.
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Great
I just wanted to make the same pole 
I chose:
Hinterzarten HS77 - it would be the smallest one
Klingenthal HS140 - it is important and nice
Kuopio HS100 - it has an interesting profile


I chose:
Hinterzarten HS77 - it would be the smallest one
Klingenthal HS140 - it is important and nice
Kuopio HS100 - it has an interesting profile
HVAC Engineer,
Senior Process Specialist with German at PwC
Senior Process Specialist with German at PwC