It was suggested before. There is no need, it would take a lot of time that could be spent on for example more jumpable hills and there would be too much for slower PCs in case of rendering.
Risen wrote:It was suggested before. There is no need, it would take a lot of time that could be spent on for example more jumpable hills and there would be too much for slower PCs in case of rendering.
Technology goes forward all the time, we don't use WIN98 any more..
Why you deciding for all people?
The game should imitate reality every year better..
Risen wrote:It was suggested before. There is no need, it would take a lot of time that could be spent on for example more jumpable hills and there would be too much for slower PCs in case of rendering.
Technology goes forward all the time, we don't use WIN98 any more..
Why you deciding for all people?
The game should imitate reality every year better..
Do you really want to wait for an extra month just to get another hill in the scenery?
skyflyer11 wrote: but one hill would block the view of the other thats the problem jussi said before
TPo wrote: Do you really want to wait for an extra month just to get another hill in the scenery?
1.For example in lahti as I say before all three hills are in different x,z axis.. so it's not porblem.
2.Do You really wanna wait 4 month just to get 3-4 more hills? ;]
Am not saying it's should be done now! but in future versions.