Alternate weekly tournaments for pro and amateur players?

[Robert_94]

Two levels are very good

[Bartek Palewicz]

That's great idea. Works well, there was a lot of players in both. But "A" should be closed for players that have less rating than 1100.

[Yannici]

Great Idea

But between 1000 and 1100 you can play both?

so far
Yannici

[Jussi Koskela]

Great Idea

But between 1000 and 1100 you can play both?

so far
Yannici

This is what I was going to propose.

[Yannici]

Oh... I didn't read the "open for all players" ...

[cruzzz112]

A and B is great, please don't change it.

[greex1]

A - World Cup - rating 1250+
B - Continental Cup - rating 1000-1249
C - FIS Cup - rating 999-0

[Altek]

A - World Cup - rating 1250+
B - Continental Cup - rating 1000-1249
C - FIS Cup - rating 999-0

Hi, How about this solution ?

http://www.mediamond.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=3544

[adin]

my sugestion:
A | 1250/1300-9999
B | 1000-1250/1300
C | 0-1000

[Templar]

Yeah, definitely there should be tournament C for players with rating less than 1000 or even 950

[Altek]

Surely should it be less than 1000. Rating 1000 is unreliable, as all new members have it.
http://www.mediamond.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=3544 those calculations based on both marathon tournaments explains what parity should be preserved

[ivica josip]

I would introduce the division based on peak rating. latest winner of the tournament B has a Peak rating 1580. Sorry for bad english!

[Christian Hermann 2]

But Peak-rating coulb be a result of the beta version. And also the number of player will probably not be balanced.?

[Bjørn Andre Monsen]

what about?

Elite - rating 1200+
A - rating 1000-1200
B - rating 0-999

[Austrian_Skijumpfan_94]

A - World Cup - rating 1250+
B - Continental Cup - rating 1000-1249
C - FIS Cup - rating 999-0

Omg this is such a great idea