General discussion about DSJ4.
Zipp
Posts: 7 Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 18:52
Location: Serbia
Contact:
Post
by Zipp » 19 Mar 2011, 00:17
Okay..let's start xD
I believe in beta 2 will be next new thing's:
Vikersund HS 225
Villach HS 98
Better Landing
Better Style
Some fixed bug's in World Cup
...and 1 question...Jussi can u make same DSJ 4 but with like FIS (Eurosport) Scoreboard,camera...and with same hill's ?
I know i spam but...
It's one of mine 1st post's
Lillehamer : 146.01
Lahti:137.01
Practice Lillehammer...(with cheat) 208.5 meter's
skiflyer11
Posts: 968 Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 18:46
Location: Austria
Contact:
Post
by skiflyer11 » 19 Mar 2011, 10:15
no i think vikersund should be in the full version
That's gotta hurt (sorry Zmaster for that fake
)
mlody5
Posts: 1236 Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 20:50
Location: Poland, Kielce
Contact:
Post
by mlody5 » 19 Mar 2011, 11:24
yes, vikersund will be in dsj4 full version
Zipp
Posts: 7 Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 18:52
Location: Serbia
Contact:
Post
by Zipp » 19 Mar 2011, 11:41
Lillehamer : 146.01
Lahti:137.01
Practice Lillehammer...(with cheat) 208.5 meter's
Moderateedd97
Posts: 17 Joined: 18 Mar 2011, 21:55
Location: Norway
Post
by Moderateedd97 » 19 Mar 2011, 12:49
skiflyer11 wrote: no i think vikersund should be in the full version
I suggest that Jussi adds a smaller flying hill in Beta 2 (Oberstorph or Planica) So that we have something to look forward to in the full version.
Norways one and only gold medal champion!
skiflyer11
Posts: 968 Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 18:46
Location: Austria
Contact:
Post
by skiflyer11 » 19 Mar 2011, 12:53
Moderateedd97 wrote: skiflyer11 wrote: no i think vikersund should be in the full version
I suggest that Jussi adds a smaller flying hill in Beta 2 (Oberstorph or Planica) So that we have something to look forward to in the full version.
i totally agree
That's gotta hurt (sorry Zmaster for that fake
)
Zipp
Posts: 7 Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 18:52
Location: Serbia
Contact:
Post
by Zipp » 19 Mar 2011, 14:24
Moderateedd97 wrote: skiflyer11 wrote: no i think vikersund should be in the full version
I suggest that Jussi adds a smaller flying hill in Beta 2 (Oberstorph or Planica) So that we have something to look forward to in the full version.
Totally agree too but i want Planica xD Not oberstdorf xD
Lillehamer : 146.01
Lahti:137.01
Practice Lillehammer...(with cheat) 208.5 meter's
skiflyer11
Posts: 968 Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 18:46
Location: Austria
Contact:
Post
by skiflyer11 » 19 Mar 2011, 14:35
Zipp wrote: Moderateedd97 wrote: skiflyer11 wrote: no i think vikersund should be in the full version
I suggest that Jussi adds a smaller flying hill in Beta 2 (Oberstorph or Planica) So that we have something to look forward to in the full version.
Totally agree too but i want Planica xD Not oberstdorf xD
me too
That's gotta hurt (sorry Zmaster for that fake
)
Zipp
Posts: 7 Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 18:52
Location: Serbia
Contact:
Post
by Zipp » 19 Mar 2011, 14:41
pepsiman89 wrote: planica isnt small
Yeah man but its same...Planica-Vikersund
I just want that camera like eurosport and scoreboard and i will be happy with Planica and Villach...p.s (u haven't to upload full xD)
hahah
Lillehamer : 146.01
Lahti:137.01
Practice Lillehammer...(with cheat) 208.5 meter's
Risto Salonen
Moderator
Posts: 159 Joined: 27 Jan 2007, 18:21
Location: Finland
Post
by Risto Salonen » 19 Mar 2011, 15:20
Don't know about the ski flying hill, but the normal one could be Midstubakken (HS 106).
skiflyer11
Posts: 968 Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 18:46
Location: Austria
Contact:
Post
by skiflyer11 » 19 Mar 2011, 19:24
Skijumpfan970 wrote: I think planica is better choice than vikersund
i agree
That's gotta hurt (sorry Zmaster for that fake
)
hallavard
Posts: 6 Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 12:31
Location: NO
Post
by hallavard » 20 Mar 2011, 18:56
Risto Salonen wrote: Don't know about the ski flying hill, but the normal one could be Midstubakken (HS 106).
Yes, Midstubakken is a beautiful hill.
- Hallavard