Deluxe Ski Jump Forum

If anti-gibbon was implemented it would probably be based on detecting excess forces applied to bindings. If so, please make the jumper lose control without the skis falling off, something similar to those replays: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1GeI003BmNV5CovjSvcL-mG_NuJS1gukC?usp=sharing...

Jussi Koskela wrote: ↑11 Apr 2023, 21:13 I think the best approach would be to support inruns in two formats: the current one and a fully custom one.

That's great to hear
If possible, I'd love to have these formats extended to dhill and outrun too

I'd prefer fully custom inrun profiles, using line, arc, polynom etc. Some inruns were even more interesting than only 2 gammas

Slide bug has also been for around 10 years. I think the issue is that players who have come back / found dsj4 after 1.7 found out that they need gibbon to be competitive, while it looks very unrealistic and is tedious to perform.

Aleks_124 wrote: ↑06 Apr 2023, 13:47 Severin meant Maciej Kot probably

I was talking about him too

How do you imagine playing DSJ 4 without gibbon? The only problem should be the perfect take off in this game? And what then ? 200 people will jump the same distance? It reads like the flight in dsj4 consists only of gibbon :P After 1000000 jumps in dsj4 you might forget that the most difficult par...

Hello, I would like to add two suggestions to 1.12.0: 1. New flags: List of territories that could receive a flag: 2. Ability to add custom flags to judges. If we have custom textures already, why not then make 3-letter flag codes editable in xml and let players play with whatever flags they want?

Xinitiao wrote: I present you:
DSJ4 Jumpers and Teams Repository
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ ... sp=sharing

New repository update

End of season CPU and NO-CPU 2022/2023 pack by Avalaya!

I think that's an awesome idea!

Making a paid DSJ5 as a clone of DSJ4 with only new features being no gibbon and windhunt mode is an awful idea.

Grzegorz Bąk won qualifications in Bischofschofen, which was quite suspicious, because he outjumped everyone. You need to work on your argumentation a bit, because this sentence describes how the game is supposed to work ;) Unless you imply he cheated because he jumped 0,5m further than you , and y...

Yeah, sure, go ban the most popular dsj4 youtuber :roll: /s But really, if anyone deserves harsher treatment, its the people who are abusive in the dsj4 online chat, not the guy who just wanted to play with the physics a bit. Moreover, anyone using ce to break records or in online is extremely easy ...

Imho even if you had the time, administering such a server would be a massive time waste. Forum is better for constructive discussions anyway

Siatko wrote: ↑04 Mar 2023, 13:17 Making servers that are going to have a lot of conflict in them anyway because there is a very visible division in the community makes no sense. Why start a new server that is doomed to fail. I am against it.

^ so much this

Jussi Koskela wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 21:19

Aleks_124 wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 20:29With replays - Just delete replays with gibbon

There are millions of replays to verify...

Would it be possible to create a tool that verifies a replay by looking at the mouse inputs in its code, without the need to simulate the whole jump?