Page 1 of 2
Hill HS 400
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 12:00
by Patryk Szczerbinski
I'd like to Jussi make a Hill HS 400. It's gonna be fun and very interesting.
What us thinking about it?
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 14:38
by Ats
That's utopic. The jumps over 300m are utopic too.
Dude with HS400 you fly half a kilometer :/
Don't agree.
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 16:08
by Patryk Szczerbinski
Why its gonna be fun!?
K20 K40 and K50
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 17:55
by lokooyv
K20, K40 and K50 would be better I think.
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 20:05
by Michal Micka
yes hill K50 or K70
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 20:36
by Audun
Maybe it would have been a little bit fun, but it's very unrealistic. But the idea K50/70 sounds nice
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 23:16
by mariokolarz
Why not K120 !!?? In DSJ 3.1.5 is 1 hill with K 121 but it's 138 HS... K120 and 135 HS!!!
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 23:19
by Audun
mariokolarz wrote:Why not K120 !!?? In DSJ 3.1.5 is 1 hill with K 121 but it's 138 HS... K120 and 135 HS!!!
Isn't that almost exactly as Norway, HS138?
Posted: 27 Jan 2007, 23:36
by Severin
To the discussion about K50 & so one...
IMHO due to the physics in DSJ3 hills, that are this small are quite irrelevant frist when it comes to realism and second when it comes to fun
In DSJ2 The difference was that the air resistance reacted way different as in DSJ3 ( as one can see e.g. with the angle from ski to level 0 )
In DSJ3 you gain your distance mostly with speed, while in DSJ2 it was with height (on hills as England ), thus hills smaller than the current United Kingdom, will imho be not to exciting... ( even more if one thinks at the current inrun speed in UK )
More exciting would be a bigger difference between the single hills ( as it was for example with hills like Slovakia in DSJ2 )
And finally, no I don't think that DSJ2 was better
Posted: 16 Feb 2007, 22:33
by Pertti Sarka
Yeah little hills i suggest.
400m
Posted: 17 Feb 2007, 14:11
by BODI
Well,why not 400 m ?
It would be something special
Posted: 19 Feb 2007, 17:24
by Jan Henrik Øverland
Smaller hills than HS85 sounds useless to me. Imagine 6-7-8 players sharing places and only a few points between the 1st round leader and the guy that couldn't reach the 2nd round. Lets keep this game free of lotto.
A hill larger than Slovenia could be funny, though. The length are already unrealistic, so why not expand into the mammoth order of magnitude? Touching the bottom of hills like that relies on skills, and would just make the game even funnier.
Posted: 19 Feb 2007, 17:45
by Vik
I wish a hill with a very fast inrun speed....
The hill shouldn't be very big hillsize, but a very long long inrun... hehe
Posted: 19 Feb 2007, 19:04
by Torsten
Vik wrote:I wish a hill with a very fast inrun speed....
The hill shouldn't be very big hillsize, but a very long long inrun... hehe
And i want an indoor hill without wind influences
Posted: 22 Feb 2007, 15:08
by Vik
Very nice idea..... NO WIND!!! Jussi, that's maybe an interesting option for all hills!!! Think about it....
Yeah!!!
Then always the best player will win.....