Page 1 of 4
HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 27 Sep 2013, 09:30
by Szymon11
"Jussi Koskela wrote:
Here's the list of remaining hills that I have been able to get permissions for:
Bischofshofen HS78
Falun HS106 (under construction)
Falun HS134 (under construction)
Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS89
Hinterzarten HS77
Hinterzarten HS108
Klingenthal HS140
Kuopio HS100
Lahti HS97
Oberstdorf HS137 (view blocked)
Oslo HS106
Oslo HS134 (view blocked)
Park City HS100
Park City HS134
Pragelato HS106
Pragelato HS140
Sapporo HS100"
Please choose three hills what in your opinion must be in 1.5 version.
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 27 Sep 2013, 11:18
by alinjr
Jussi Planica HS139 Bloudkova Velikanka you have permission?
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 27 Sep 2013, 11:59
by piekarzinho
Park City HS134
Hinterzarten HS108
Klingenthal HS140
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 27 Sep 2013, 16:20
by Rajmek1233
Bischofshofen HS78
Klingenthal HS140
Pragelato HS140
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 27 Sep 2013, 17:09
by Szymon11
Lahti HS 97
Klingenthal HS 140
Park City HS 134
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 28 Sep 2013, 13:24
by domi_deluxe
i don't like small hills - so i chose the 3 "big" ones:
Klingenthal
Park City
Pragelato
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 28 Sep 2013, 18:58
by J.MIRO
So Klinghental for 100% in next version, than Park City HS134 and Hinterzarten HS108, maybe Bischofshofen HS78. For me - not bad.
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 28 Sep 2013, 23:08
by smolarkus
We have 11 large hills, I want more small hills.
Bischofshofen HS78, Lahti HS97, Sapporo HS100
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 01:08
by MattyPolz14
PLEASE PARK CITY HILLS!!!!! I jump them all the time in real life and would love to have them in the game. Also Jussi, if you make them, could you please design te summer plastic like in real life? (see below)
http://www.panoramio.com/m/photo/2844458
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 30 Sep 2013, 01:43
by Tonio94
And don't you want guys GaPa with its special and recognizable green tower?
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 01 Oct 2013, 10:22
by Pertti Sarka
domi_deluxe wrote:i don't like small hills - so i chose the 3 "big" ones:
Klingenthal
Park City
Pragelato
X2
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 01 Oct 2013, 18:58
by EgyLynx
Prageleto nh and Kuopio nh not voted eyet?
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 01 Oct 2013, 20:42
by J.MIRO
In my opinion DSJ4 needs more non-european hills and hills wnich have old, not regular profile. Thats why I voted for Lahti HS97, Park City HS134 and Sapporo HS100.
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 03:09
by MattyPolz14
J.MIRO wrote:In my opinion DSJ4 needs more non-european hills and hills wnich have old, not regular profile. Thats why I voted for Lahti HS97, Park City HS134 and Sapporo HS100.
Park City HS134 is regular profile, I mean it may be 11 years old but it is still regular profile.
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0
Posted: 06 Oct 2013, 20:22
by Pavlokox
Great
I just wanted to make the same pole
I chose:
Hinterzarten HS77 - it would be the smallest one
Klingenthal HS140 - it is important and nice
Kuopio HS100 - it has an interesting profile