Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)
Posted: 01 Nov 2012, 16:27
If you want complete buliding of Holmenkollen HS134 ?
or partial buliding for jumping with F2 camera ?

or partial buliding for jumping with F2 camera ?

The Official Deluxe Ski Jump Forum
https://www.mediamond.fi/forum/
DO.TheMrSkiBartek wrote:If you want complete buliding of Holmenkollen HS134 ?
be quietJussi Koskela wrote:In DSJ3 even one infamous tree between the camera and the ski jumper was too much.
Humm? I think Jussi will decide.TheMrSkiBartek wrote:be quietJussi Koskela wrote:In DSJ3 even one infamous tree between the camera and the ski jumper was too much.:PP
People will decide
it's a GOOD IDEA. It's the same for example in Harrachov, wind nets on HS 205 on the right side.mlody5 wrote:Walls should be transparent on F2/F12
Partially transparent (fast moving) structures close to camera are very irritating to eye, too.mlody5 wrote:Walls should be transparent on F2/F12
also snowiness could be very irritating to eye ;>Jussi Koskela wrote:Partially transparent (fast moving) structures close to camera are very irritating to eye, too.mlody5 wrote:Walls should be transparent on F2/F12
That's quite different since the snow/water particles are very small and there's motion blur applied to it. Without motion blur it would look awful. Applying motion blur to other graphics is *much* more difficult and would use lots of GPU resources.TheMrSkiBartek wrote: also snowiness could be very irritating to eye ;>
but... if something is on the right side of hill - I think that 1% players use F12 - could BE?Jussi Koskela wrote:Partially transparent (fast moving) structures close to camera are very irritating to eye, too.mlody5 wrote:Walls should be transparent on F2/F12
COME ON, no comon.TheMrSkiBartek wrote:Comon people!!! Hallelujah!!!