Deluxe Ski Jump Forum

Jussi what do you think about fully numbering the landing hills due to the real hill counter parts. For example, numbering on a normal hill usually starts around 45m, numbering on a large usually starts around 60m and numbering on a ski flying hill usually starts around 80m. Also you could make Planica's like Planica's style of numbering, for example: 123456789 90 123456789 100 and so on.

Also any distance markers past K would be red, any distance markers past blue line would be blue and any distance markers before blue line would be yellow

MattyPolz14 wrote:Jussi what do you think about fully numbering the landing hills due to the real hill counter parts. For example, numbering on a normal hill usually starts around 45m, numbering on a large usually starts around 60m and numbering on a ski flying hill usually starts around 80m.

That's right, the distance numbers should start earlier than the distance lines. I can change it. Who wants to find out the ranges for each hill?

MattyPolz14 wrote:Also you could make Planica's like Planica's style of numbering, for example: 123456789 90 123456789 100 and so on.

I have omitted the one meter numbering because it looks irritating when the camera is moving fast.

Why not using option Edit?
But... this will be a problem with using two quotes to one answer... for me

Jussi Koskela wrote:

MattyPolz14 wrote:Jussi what do you think about fully numbering the landing hills due to the real hill counter parts. For example, numbering on a normal hill usually starts around 45m, numbering on a large usually starts around 60m and numbering on a ski flying hill usually starts around 80m.

That's right, the distance numbers should start earlier than the distance lines. I can change it. Who wants to find out the ranges for each hill?

I can find out the ranges for each hill

MattyPolz14 wrote:

Jussi Koskela wrote:

MattyPolz14 wrote:Jussi what do you think about fully numbering the landing hills due to the real hill counter parts. For example, numbering on a normal hill usually starts around 45m, numbering on a large usually starts around 60m and numbering on a ski flying hill usually starts around 80m.

That's right, the distance numbers should start earlier than the distance lines. I can change it. Who wants to find out the ranges for each hill?

I can find out the ranges for each hill

Hill ranges:

Bad Mitterndorf HS 200: 100m-210m

Engelberg HS 137: 60m-150m

Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS 140: 60m-150m

Kuusamo HS 142: 50m-147m

Lahti HS 130: 50m-130m

Lillehammer HS 138: 60m-150m

Oberstdorf HS 213: 110m-230m

Planica HS 215: 80m-240m

Val Di Fiemme HS 134: 60m-141m

Val Di Fiemme HS 106: 40m-110m

Villach HS 98: 40m-110m

Willingen HS 145: 70m-160m

Zakopane HS 94: 40m-95m

Thanks! I have now updated the ranges.

Hill ranges:

Bad Mitterndorf HS 200: 100m-210m

Engelberg HS 137: 60m-150m

Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS 140: 60m-150m

Kuusamo HS 142: 50m-147m

Lahti HS 130: 50m-130m

Lillehammer HS 138: 60m-150m

Oberstdorf HS 213: 110m-230m

Planica HS 215: 80m-240m

Val Di Fiemme HS 134: 60m-141m

Val Di Fiemme HS 106: 40m-110m

Villach HS 98: 40m-110m

Willingen HS 145: 70m-160m

Zakopane HS 94: 40m-95m

You missed Sapporo HS134 ^^

Sapporo 60-145

Ok thanks! Sorry, I did get the ranges for Sapporo, I just forgot to write them down haha, and I got the same range as you, so that's perfect, and no problem!

I collected:

Zakopane HS134 - 50 m-150 m
Kuopio HS127 - 60 m-140 m

Pavlokox wrote:I collected:

Zakopane HS134 - 50 m-150 m
Kuopio HS127 - 60 m-140 m

Thanks

Anybody knows/can find the distance numbering ranges for Lillehammer HS100?

@Jussi Koskela: In summer 70-100 meters. In winter 70-105 meters.