Page 1 of 1
					
				Lahti
				Posted: 17 Mar 2012, 00:25
				by CalinStelistu
				Hi,
Why in the Lahti hill is not the hs 96 hill and the 3rd hill (i dont know his hs) between hs 130?
It can be very good if Jussi do that!  

 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 17 Mar 2012, 07:05
				by Risen
				It was suggested before. There is no need, it would take a lot of time that could be spent on for example more jumpable hills and there would be too much for slower PCs in case of rendering.
			 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 17 Mar 2012, 20:11
				by liverpoolkd14
				Risen wrote:It was suggested before. There is no need, it would take a lot of time that could be spent on for example more jumpable hills and there would be too much for slower PCs in case of rendering.
Technology goes forward all the time, we don't use WIN98 any more.. 
Why you deciding for all people?
The game should imitate reality every year better..
 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 17 Mar 2012, 20:12
				by skiflyer11
				but one hill would block the view of the other thats the problem jussi said before  

 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 17 Mar 2012, 20:24
				by TPo
				liverpoolkd14 wrote:Risen wrote:It was suggested before. There is no need, it would take a lot of time that could be spent on for example more jumpable hills and there would be too much for slower PCs in case of rendering.
Technology goes forward all the time, we don't use WIN98 any more.. 
Why you deciding for all people?
The game should imitate reality every year better..
 
Do you really want to wait for an extra month just to get another hill in the scenery?
 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 17 Mar 2012, 22:12
				by liverpoolkd14
				skyflyer11 wrote: but one hill would block the view of the other thats the problem jussi said before  
TPo wrote: Do you really want to wait for an extra month just to get another hill in the scenery?
1.For example in lahti as I say before all three hills are in different x,z axis.. so it's not porblem.
2.Do You really wanna wait 4 month just to get 3-4 more hills? ;] 
Am not saying it's should be done now! but in future versions.
 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 17 Mar 2012, 22:46
				by skiflyer11
				liverpoolkd14 wrote:1.For example in lahti as I say before all three hills are in different x,z axis.. so it's not porblem.
i made some tests in gsu and the view is 
really blocked you dont see anything  

 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 18 Mar 2012, 00:39
				by Risen
				liverpoolkd14 wrote:Why you deciding for all people?
The game should imitate reality every year better..
I'm quoting the official statement of Jussi.
And it gets better every year. We have to 
be patient kurwa, because it's developed by only one person.
 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 18 Mar 2012, 19:41
				by CalinStelistu
				skiflyer11 wrote:liverpoolkd14 wrote:1.For example in lahti as I say before all three hills are in different x,z axis.. so it's not porblem.
i made some tests in gsu and the view is 
really blocked you dont see anything  

 
why u dont post a screenshot?
 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 18 Mar 2012, 19:46
				by CalinStelistu
				And I want to ask why this hills are not in the hs130 view, no to play on this hills. u play only on hs130...
			 
			
					
				Re: Lahti
				Posted: 18 Mar 2012, 20:40
				by skiflyer11
				CalinStelistu wrote:And I want to ask why this hills are not in the hs130 view, no to play on this hills. u play only on hs130...
but that would be totally useless  
