Page 1 of 1

name hill

Posted: 26 Mar 2011, 17:17
by mario123456783
I think the hill should be called like this:

Lillehammer K-123
Lahti K-116

called a point of K and not HS

Re: name hill

Posted: 26 Mar 2011, 17:22
by skiflyer11
mario123456783 wrote:I think the hill should be called like this:

Lillehammer K-123
Lahti K-116

called a point of K and not HS
no i do not agree the k-point is much older and you can better compare the hills with the hillsize

Posted: 26 Mar 2011, 18:53
by Skoczek12
Best:

Lillehammer HS138 (K123)
Lahti HS130 (K116)

Posted: 26 Mar 2011, 20:28
by skiflyer11
Skoczek12 wrote:Best:

Lillehammer HS138 (K123)
Lahti HS130 (K116)
No i think lillehammer hs138 is enough

Posted: 26 Mar 2011, 22:56
by J.MIRO
Lillehammer HS138
Zakopane HS134
Vikersund HS225
better than:
Lillehammer K123
Zakopane K120
Vikersund K195

Posted: 26 Mar 2011, 23:25
by mario123m
I think this should be switchable in options. K or HS. :) I also prefer K.

Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 11:55
by skiflyer11
J.MIRO wrote:Lillehammer HS138
Zakopane HS134
Vikersund HS225
better than:
Lillehammer K123
Zakopane K120
Vikersund K195
much better

Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 12:01
by Basadoni
It must be HS. It`s up to date.

Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 13:07
by Dan Ionescu
I like K point much more than HS measurement... I'm sad they switched to HS.

Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 14:27
by pepsiman89
so you would rather have
Kuopio K120
Kuusamo K120
even though the HS's are 127 and 142? its better to have the HS shown and not K point, that way we can easily determine which hill is bigger etc...

it would suck if ti woudl look like this:

Courchevel K120
Oberhof K120
Predazzo K120
Sapporo K120
Liberec K120
you wouldnt know which hill to pick -.-

Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 14:30
by skiflyer11
pepsiman89 wrote:so you would rather have
Kuopio K120
Kuusamo K120
even though the HS's are 127 and 142? its better to have the HS shown and not K point, that way we can easily determine which hill is bigger etc...

it would suck if ti woudl look like this:

Courchevel K120
Oberhof K120
Predazzo K120
Sapporo K120
Liberec K120
you wouldnt know which hill to pick -.-
i totally agree

Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 15:58
by Marekb
the best is point K and HS

Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 16:11
by skiflyer11
Marekb wrote:the best is point K and HS
no just the HS is enough

Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 20:28
by alexander
mario123m wrote:I think this should be switchable in options. K or HS. :) I also prefer K.
always go for customisation. that's the easiest way of satisfying everyone.

Posted: 27 Mar 2011, 20:42
by bulwa11
HS is better. Why ? Because there is a lot of K-120 hills out there but it turns out that on some its possible to jump 130 meters maximum and on others 145 meters. So K-120 doesnt really tell that much about a hill. The new HS shows us the real possibilities of jumping on that hill