What hills would you like in DSJ4 beta2/3/4...FULL VERSION!

[RobertKranjecFAN]

Jussi KoskeIa
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Location: Finland

My guess: fake account...

The real Jussi:
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 750
Location: Finland

[szamtoch]

Ok. In Beta 2 will be Vikersund.

This is cheap ''Jussi'' : /

[szymbar15]

Four people are blind... O_o

I'd like Vikersund, jumping 260m! That would be real fun!

[Ascot]

Four people are blind... O_o

I'd like Vikersund, jumping 260m! That would be real fun!

I'm for Planica , it's cooler than Vikersund and you

can Jump 260m too.

_________________

Lahti HS130 : 135,87m
Lillehammer HS138 : 143,37m

[tetris]

i want all hills

me too, i like jump on big hills

[ganjaman92]

im really wondering if the fly curve in game in vikersund is as its in real, like 3 meters above the ground. Not like in planica where u have about 10 meters!

[lukicabukica]

im really wondering if the fly curve in game in vikersund is as its in real, like 3 meters above the ground. Not like in planica where u have about 10 meters!

amm... You know our jumpers said that in Planica its very hard to jump over the curve as in Vikersund is easyer. And also in planica they somekinda made the table more inclined
(before 10.8° now 11.5°) Franci Petek sait that it seems very small but its a very big change.
Before: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOcf42b5 ... re=related
Now: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/1/mqZbnsKhOZ4
But i still dont understand Damjan: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/6/4keR3fGxsQ0

[skiflyer11]

im really wondering if the fly curve in game in vikersund is as its in real, like 3 meters above the ground. Not like in planica where u have about 10 meters!

thats a good question

[ganjaman92]

im really wondering if the fly curve in game in vikersund is as its in real, like 3 meters above the ground. Not like in planica where u have about 10 meters!

amm... You know our jumpers said that in Planica its very hard to jump over the curve as in Vikersund is easyer. And also in planica they somekinda made the table more inclined
(before 10.8° now 11.5°) Franci Petek sait that it seems very small but its a very big change.
Before: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOcf42b5 ... re=related
Now: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/1/mqZbnsKhOZ4
But i still dont understand Damjan: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/6/4keR3fGxsQ0

hey, i didnt mean this curve after take off. I was just talkin about the high of the flight. In vikersund they fly 3 meters above the ground, and in planica around 8-10 meters.
And im wondering if in dsj4 we also gonna fly around 3 meters above the ground. That was my point.

And to damjans jump. What dont you understand? U mean that he "only" flew 220m? Well he didnt have the speed at the end so he fell down.

[skiflyer11]

im really wondering if the fly curve in game in vikersund is as its in real, like 3 meters above the ground. Not like in planica where u have about 10 meters!

amm... You know our jumpers said that in Planica its very hard to jump over the curve as in Vikersund is easyer. And also in planica they somekinda made the table more inclined
(before 10.8° now 11.5°) Franci Petek sait that it seems very small but its a very big change.
Before: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOcf42b5 ... re=related
Now: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/1/mqZbnsKhOZ4
But i still dont understand Damjan: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/6/4keR3fGxsQ0

hey, i didnt mean this curve after take off. I was just talkin about the high of the flight. In vikersund they fly 3 meters above the ground, and in planica around 8-10 meters.
And im wondering if in dsj4 we also gonna fly around 3 meters above the ground. That was my point.

maybe he had lots of backwind

And to damjans jump. What dont you understand? U mean that he "only" flew 220m? Well he didnt have the speed at the end so he fell down.

[ganjaman92]

amm... You know our jumpers said that in Planica its very hard to jump over the curve as in Vikersund is easyer. And also in planica they somekinda made the table more inclined
(before 10.8° now 11.5°) Franci Petek sait that it seems very small but its a very big change.
Before: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOcf42b5 ... re=related
Now: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/1/mqZbnsKhOZ4
But i still dont understand Damjan: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/6/4keR3fGxsQ0

hey, i didnt mean this curve after take off. I was just talkin about the high of the flight. In vikersund they fly 3 meters above the ground, and in planica around 8-10 meters.
And im wondering if in dsj4 we also gonna fly around 3 meters above the ground. That was my point.

maybe he had lots of backwind

And to damjans jump. What dont you understand? U mean that he "only" flew 220m? Well he didnt have the speed at the end so he fell down.

no i dont think he had backwind. ALso the commentary says he has a nice straight front wind. I think the problem here was that damjan set his skies too steep after take off. That made him going that high, but also it decelerated his speed.

[OlliT]

hey, i didnt mean this curve after take off. I was just talkin about the high of the flight. In vikersund they fly 3 meters above the ground, and in planica around 8-10 meters.
And im wondering if in dsj4 we also gonna fly around 3 meters above the ground. That was my point.

maybe he had lots of backwind

And to damjans jump. What dont you understand? U mean that he "only" flew 220m? Well he didnt have the speed at the end so he fell down.

no i dont think he had backwind. ALso the commentary says he has a nice straight front wind. I think the problem here was that damjan set his skies too steep after take off. That made him going that high, but also it decelerated his speed.

the wind compensation points were something like -21, and I think that what gamjaman ment was Damjan's very high flying trajectory, am I correct?

[ganjaman92]

no i dont think he had backwind. ALso the commentary says he has a nice straight front wind. I think the problem here was that damjan set his skies too steep after take off. That made him going that high, but also it decelerated his speed.

the wind compensation points were something like -21, and I think that what gamjaman ment was Damjan's very high flying trajectory, am I correct?

yeah you're right. And at the end he is just "fallin down" to 220m because after the take off he lost too much speed.

[OlliT]

no i dont think he had backwind. ALso the commentary says he has a nice straight front wind. I think the problem here was that damjan set his skies too steep after take off. That made him going that high, but also it decelerated his speed.

the wind compensation points were something like -21, and I think that what gamjaman ment was Damjan's very high flying trajectory, am I correct?

yeah you're right. And at the end he is just "fallin down" to 220m because after the take off he lost too much speed.

Exactly. Imagine if Kranjec or Schlierenzauer would've had those wind conditions

[lukicabukica]

the wind compensation points were something like -21, and I think that what gamjaman ment was Damjan's very high flying trajectory, am I correct?

yeah you're right. And at the end he is just "fallin down" to 220m because after the take off he lost too much speed.

Exactly. Imagine if Kranjec or Schlierenzauer would've had those wind conditions

Uh, oh a WR???
And i think Damjan didnt get the wind cushion in his body.

Stare itak łegenda... Mislim da bo to dolg polet Damjana! Še vleci! Tako je! Odlično! Nov osebni rekord!