Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 15 Dec 2013, 20:00
Titisee-Neustadt maybe?
Yeah. When the new ironwood is finished, I'd really like to see it.AlexRollercoaster wrote:Titisee-Neustadt maybe?
Deluxe Ski Jump Forum
The Official Deluxe Ski Jump Forum
https://www.mediamond.fi/forum/
HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Page 3 of 6
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 17 Dec 2013, 00:05
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 19 Dec 2013, 14:59
- Vikersund K-195
- Innsbruck K-120
- Hinterzanten K-95
- Hakuba K-120
- Vancouver K-125 K-95
- Sochi K-125 K-95
- Courchevel K-120 K-90
- Planica K-125
- Oslo K-120
- Innsbruck K-120
- Hinterzanten K-95
- Hakuba K-120
- Vancouver K-125 K-95
- Sochi K-125 K-95
- Courchevel K-120 K-90
- Planica K-125
- Oslo K-120
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 20 Dec 2013, 22:23
I also agree with him wants these ski jumps
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 24 Dec 2013, 01:13
Liberec Hs 134, Einsiedeln hs 117 Neustadt hs 142 troondheim hs 140 - they are very easy hills
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 30 Dec 2013, 12:19
I was skijumper in hinterzarten, 2 years ago! I like this hill and would like to jump that in DSJ4, too 
so far
so far
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 31 Dec 2013, 15:48
Well, we have 16 hills form Europe, 5 hills form Scandinavia, 2 from America and 1 from Asia.
4 ski flying hills, 5 normal hills, 1 medium hill and 14 large hills.
I really, really would like to see Sapporo HS100, Kuopio HS100 and Lahti HS97. This shouldn't be problem for Jussi.
4 ski flying hills, 5 normal hills, 1 medium hill and 14 large hills.
I really, really would like to see Sapporo HS100, Kuopio HS100 and Lahti HS97. This shouldn't be problem for Jussi.
PENIS!
Posted: 01 Jan 2014, 00:38
I would like to see a hill between HS 110 and HS 125 because i still feel that VdF HS106 is small and Kuopio HS 127 is big and something between that would be really nice and of course the biggest hills of all shouldnt miss.
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 03 Jan 2014, 13:28
I would certainly like to see Titisee-Neustadt. 
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 05 Jan 2014, 10:03
I'm copy my post from another thread.
Swag wrote:Courchevel HS132
Einsiedeln HS117
Hakuba HS131
Harrachov HS142
Hinterzarten HS108
Innsbruck HS130
Iron Mountain HS133
Oberstdorf HS137
Oslo HS134
Oslo HS106
Titisee-Neustadt HS142
Trondheim HS140
Vikersund HS225
Planica HS139
Falun HS134
Erzurum HS140
Niżny Tagił HS134
Stams HS115
Seefeld HS109
Westby HS118
Krasnaja Polana HS105
Krasnaja Polana HS140
Nothing more.
I know, in this everything we may be wait on 2-3 years, but this is so fantastic hills. Must be.
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 05 Jan 2014, 15:08
I can't wait for these hills:
Innsbruck HS 130
Planica HS 104
Planica HS 139
Oberstdorf HS 137
Oslo HS 134
Rena HS 139
Titisee-Neustadt HS 142
Trondheim HS 140
Vikersund HS 225
and
NEW Planica HS 225
Innsbruck HS 130
Planica HS 104
Planica HS 139
Oberstdorf HS 137
Oslo HS 134
Rena HS 139
Titisee-Neustadt HS 142
Trondheim HS 140
Vikersund HS 225
and
NEW Planica HS 225
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 05 Jan 2014, 16:20
In my opinion priority is add to the next version Insbruck HS130 and Oberstdorf HS137 and maybe some hill with @up. So as to system KO was closed in four hill and of course online records
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 06 Jan 2014, 10:48
I hope Rasnov HS100 ( Romania ) will be in this game because its a hill from my country....This hill will host this year 2 stages in WC ladies
http://berkutschi.com/en/front/hills/tr ... carbunarii
http://berkutschi.com/en/front/hills/tr ... carbunarii
Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 07 Jan 2014, 01:08
Kranj hill and Planica HS 139 and 104
and Planica HS 139 and 104Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6
Posted: 07 Jan 2014, 17:38
It would be nice if they were in the game such as hills Oberstdorf HS137, Lahti HS97, Sapporo HS100 and Oslo HS106. I also hope that in the end will also appear Innsbruck HS130, Oslo HS134, Falun HS134, Trondheim HS140, Courchevel HS132 and Vikersund HS225. It would be wonderfully.