Page 3 of 4
Posted: 21 Mar 2011, 21:37
by skiflyer11
Thanatos wrote:plkmetal1990 wrote:I want to say that this game is for everyone, not only for Polish players, so don't be so selfish...
That's just wrong. At last we should admit, that DSJ only was created to help polish people killing time.
yes because they have no jobs
Posted: 21 Mar 2011, 21:40
by bulwa11
guys come on, Im Polish and no one ever had trouble with me here... so why bash Polish jumpers overall ? There are maaany good and calm Polish people here, really...I cant control the idiot part of Polish community
Posted: 22 Mar 2011, 14:30
by J.MIRO
bulwa11 wrote:doesnt normal mean ~k-90 ? and 'big' means ~k-120 ?
Flying hill
HS 185-....
K 170-...
Big hill
HS 110-184
K 100-169
Normal hill
HS 85-109
K 75-99
Medium hill
HS 50-84
K 45-74
Small hill
HS 20-49
K 20-44
Posted: 22 Mar 2011, 17:59
by lukicabukica
HAHAHAHAHA J.MIRO!!!!!!!!
normal hill
K85-100
HS95-120
large hill
K115-140
HS125-150
flying hill
K150...
HS160...
Posted: 22 Mar 2011, 18:43
by Thanatos
For God's sake, please stop writing bullshit.
Standards for the Construction of Jumping Hills - 2008 by FIS contains useful information on page 6:
So, J.MIRO was absolutely right.
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 00:21
by lukicabukica
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 01:33
by Thanatos
Think about it: Copper Peak was build in the 1960s and the smallest of six hills since the invention of ski flying. Today it's closed, official certificate ran out in 1995. In fact it'll be homologated never again, under no circumstances, except somebody is interested in investing several million dollars.
Apart from that this sign is irrelevant. Official rules classify hills. Yep. Today it'd need a HS of at least 185 metres to be classified as Flying hill, so in this condition Ironwood would just be some kind of (really) big Large hill.
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 15:47
by J.MIRO
Thanatos wrote:Think about it: Copper Peak was build in the 1960s and the smallest of six hills since the invention of ski flying. Today it's closed, official certificate ran out in 1995. In fact it'll be homologated never again, under no circumstances, except somebody is interested in investing several million dollars.
Apart from that this sign is irrelevant. Official rules classify hills. Yep. Today it'd need a HS of at least 185 metres to be classified as Flying hill, so in this condition Ironwood would just be some kind of (really) big Large hill.
This is my favourite hill...
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 17:18
by lukicabukica
you see even J.MIRO is with me!!!
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 17:51
by J.MIRO
lukicabukica wrote:you see even J.MIRO is with me!!!
What do you mean?
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:14
by lukicabukica
ehm ehm...
I was not wrong "HS160..."
And it seems you like Copper Peak so...
You are obviously getting me!
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:15
by skiflyer11
lukicabukica wrote:ehm ehm...
I was not wrong "HS160..."
And it seems you like Copper Peak so...
You are obviously getting me!
no it is k160
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:18
by lukicabukica
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:18
by J.MIRO
skiflyer11 wrote:lukicabukica wrote:ehm ehm...
I was not wrong "HS160..."
And it seems you like Copper Peak so...
You are obviously getting me!
no it is k160
No, this is K145 HS160. Go to wikipedia.
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:19
by lukicabukica
