Deluxe Ski Jump Forum

grammarnazi wrote:Hello.

Why wouldn't you just let people pick, what kind of hills they want to use in their games? Talking about realistic/unrealistic set here. I don't really get it, since it shouldn't be that much of a big deal to let people actually choose whether they want to use RL hills, the fake ones or maybe mix both of the types together.

Regards

Everyone but hipsters would take both. :p

Jussi I have an idea to add the sound of the crowd in the next version

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGZwcPCY ... re=related

I have one idea that you can see the landscape from the side
http://www.picshot.pl/public/view/70638

I have another ideas, more useful than TREES.

First:
Jussi, you could make the Jumpers selection menu just like you did with Hills, so we can choose order of jumpers.

Second:
Idea for hills menu. There are to <i don't know how to call it > places with hills, right? Left is with available and right is with hills on cup. My idea: in right menu, when we click on some hill with right mouse button we have another menu, and in this menu we can select accurate date and time (maybe snow too) of competition.

Do you like this idea? Tell me, please, what do you think about that.

Dydux666 wrote:I have another ideas, more useful than TREES.

First:
Jussi, you could make the Jumpers selection menu just like you did with Hills, so we can choose order of jumpers.

Second:
Idea for hills menu. There are to <i don't know how to call it > places with hills, right? Left is with available and right is with hills on cup. My idea: in right menu, when we click on some hill with right mouse button we have another menu, and in this menu we can select accurate date and time (maybe snow too) of competition.

Do you like this idea? Tell me, please, what do you think about that.

First is moderate, because of difficulty of UI, second, detailed calendar planner should be okay.

i have just two ideas left for DSJ 4 now...
1. is of course the trees...
2. is... Jussi can you make the flight lower? what i mean is that in the flight phase the jumper would fly lower, and in the end get the amount of wind in his body, like in rl. is that possible?
AND can you make planica narrower? because planica had to be widen. even though it still is veeeery narrow... aand wooden...

lukicabukica wrote: AND can you make planica narrower? because planica had to be widen. even though it still is veeeery narrow... aand wooden...

What do you mean?

I think he means the widenes of the slope. Actually now that it's mentioned, i noticed that in reality (tv transmitions) plannica looks really wide at the lowest point. Is ingame planica the same size as in reality?

Jussi Koskela wrote:

lukicabukica wrote: AND can you make planica narrower? because planica had to be widen. even though it still is veeeery narrow... aand wooden...

What do you mean?

i mean that the hill is to wide. look:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/83 ... 2dsj4.png/
and real life:

so planica is no nearly wide as in dsj 4.
and by wooden i mean the banks... wait for it...
here dsj:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/196/36888745.jpg/
and real life:

you can see the wooden... wooden... banks...
AND in pictures you can notice the trees too
sooo flight... aha...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlmaaKgFyQU
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1-pL8Vh ... re=related
in dsj it just looks like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3mmwxTLm7g
i hope you understand

I am using measures from year 2010 for Planica. The width should be accurate at the K-point and at the bottom of the hill. The basic difference is that in Planica the width is not increasing linearly from the takeoff to K-point as in most hills. I haven't modeled this.

and i have an idea... it will seem funny for you but i dont take it so funny...

lukicabukica wrote:and i have an idea... it will seem funny for you but i dont take it so funny...

Very bad idea.... because if you jump for example with F2, you can´t really see the ski jumper anymore at the take off.

@19Weiler95
but if youd put it somewhere else it would be good.

Jussi Koskela wrote:I am using measures from year 2010 for Planica. The width should be accurate at the K-point and at the bottom of the hill. The basic difference is that in Planica the width is not increasing linearly from the takeoff to K-point as in most hills. I haven't modeled this.

it think the skijumper fly lovver in planica in real, than in the game

Bjørn Andre Monsen wrote:

Jussi Koskela wrote:I am using measures from year 2010 for Planica. The width should be accurate at the K-point and at the bottom of the hill. The basic difference is that in Planica the width is not increasing linearly from the takeoff to K-point as in most hills. I haven't modeled this.

it think the skijumper fly lovver in planica in real, than in the game

Could you stop writing "vv" instead of "w"? It's really annoying...