Page 2 of 2

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 14 Jan 2012, 20:04
by staly
If You read all topic, you'll get to know that it will be optional.

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 15 Jan 2012, 21:08
by Risen
TPo wrote:
Jussi Koskela wrote:This is now on my todo list.
Please make it optional. I still want to see the exact distance of all jumps in competitions.
Signed.

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 15 Jan 2012, 23:32
by Metsi
Risen wrote:
TPo wrote:
Jussi Koskela wrote:This is now on my todo list.
Please make it optional. I still want to see the exact distance of all jumps in competitions.
Signed.
+1

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 13:17
by Jussi Koskela
Jussi Koskela wrote:This is now on my todo list.
I removed this from my todo list. :wink:

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 18:49
by Metsi
todolaterwhenidecideitsreallynescessary list? :P

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 19:08
by SuperAdo111
doyouhavespace? why you deleted it Jussi?

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 20:32
by Deninho1989
probably because he has already done this ;)

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 18 Jan 2012, 21:06
by Jussi Koskela
Deninho1989 is right.

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 09:14
by Risen
Deninho1989 wrote:probably because he has already done this ;)
Jussi Koskela wrote:Deninho1989 is right.
Golden mouth for both :lol:

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 21:46
by mikulasturan
116,75-117,24 = 117,0m
117,25-117,74 = 117,5m

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 22:07
by Jussi Koskela
mikulasturan wrote:116,75-117,24 = 117,0m
117,25-117,74 = 117,5m
Wrong. The lengths are always rounded down to the nearest half meter.

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 22:18
by mikulasturan
Jussi Koskela wrote:
mikulasturan wrote:116,75-117,24 = 117,0m
117,25-117,74 = 117,5m
Wrong. The lengths are always rounded down to the nearest half meter.
ok :D

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 22 Jan 2012, 13:56
by staly
My idea won ? I'm glad ^^

Re: Less detailed jump length displaying.

Posted: 24 Jan 2012, 00:21
by nordisc
Love it - thanks Jussi!