Page 2 of 2
Posted: 28 Jan 2008, 01:04
by Jani Oravisjärvi
Great jump Jakub!
It clearly could have been over 320m, although I think timing of landing is still ok. It would have been very easy to crash.
Posted: 28 Jan 2008, 07:52
by Krzysztof Ronka
Congratulation Jakub. Excellent jump with a flying phase being very sensitive and adequate to the augmented wind power; +4 while landing! It is deemed that you delayed a little bid a take-off. Otherwise the magic 320m barrier would be broken.
Posted: 28 Jan 2008, 16:56
by Domin
I ja rowniez przylaczam sie do gratulacje. Znakomity skok- to pokazuje kto tu rzadzi...
Mnie kilka dni temu udalo sie ukrecic tez calkiem dobry wynik na SLO 317,72- do sciagniecia tutaj
http://www.4shared.com/file/36188922/51 ... 2_slo.html
Pozdro i jeszcze raz graty... 320 bylo na wyciagniecie reki

Posted: 28 Jan 2008, 20:01
by Chabiker
THx all

but one crazy guy did 320.50 today - crazy because he landed with telemark 19.0 20.0 19.5

thanks God he hasn't registered yet
http://www.sendspace.com/file/c9nd1o
________
YZR-M1
Jakub
Posted: 28 Jan 2008, 21:01
by Eirik
Jakub, that was just too close

you could have jumped those 40 cm extra

but thats only unluck
Edit: What camera viev did you use? f1 or f2?
Posted: 29 Jan 2008, 17:51
by Chabiker
F1 sucks its for kids I use only F2
________
ARIZONA DISPENSARIES
F2
Posted: 30 Jan 2008, 20:56
by Eirik
i also use F2

before i used F1 but i tried F2 and it worked better

Posted: 23 Dec 2008, 14:11
by Ski jumper
I think it is possible to jump 320m without slowmotion

Posted: 23 Dec 2008, 18:38
by Krzysztof Stuchlik
Yes, because i jump 320,32 m:)
Posted: 23 Dec 2008, 20:47
by Ski jumper
Really good jump!
