Page 2 of 2

Re: type hill

Posted: 27 Apr 2011, 08:08
by Austrian_Skijumpfan_94
Cody Hann wrote:
Austrian_Skijumpfan_94 wrote:k 195 + not because this is not realistic

k 85 - who knows :D
Was Slovenia HS281 in DSJ3 realistic? :)
no ^^

Re: type hill

Posted: 27 Apr 2011, 12:03
by Thanatos
Austrian_Skijumpfan_94 wrote:k 195 + not because this is not realistic

k 85 - who knows :D
K195+, not realistic? Vikersund? Furthermore: Don't forget that there are plans to rebuild Kulm and Letalnica. So it's quite possible that they've to create somehin' with a K-point of 200 or 205 metres, if they want to have the biggest hill. We'll see, maybe already in 2012 or 2014.

Re: type hill

Posted: 27 Apr 2011, 14:51
by J.MIRO
skiflyer11 wrote:
Austrian_Skijumpfan_94 wrote:Large hills are untill HS 145 :roll:
not really :lol:

Small Hill: K-Point 20-45 m HS25-49 m
Medium Hill: K-Point 46-74 m HS50-74 m
Normal Hill: K-Point 75-99 m HS75-109 m
Large Hill: K-Point 100-120 m HS110-184 m
Flying Hill: K-Point 145-185 m HS185 m
Large hill- K100-169m HS110-184m
Flying hill K170-.... HS185m-....
How many times I am supposed to repeat it???????? :!: :!: :!: :!: :!: :?:

Re: type hill

Posted: 27 Apr 2011, 14:57
by skiflyer11
lukicabukica wrote:
Jussi Koskela wrote:I'll try to include a variety of different sized hills to keep the jumping interesting.
jussi please http://www.skisprungschanzen.com/EN/Ski ... 64-Mostec/
the k-55 ???
nice hill :P

Re: type hill

Posted: 28 Apr 2011, 18:23
by Mario Kickmayer
This would be a great option for the smallest hill :mrgreen:

I think it isn“t a good idea to animate bigger hills than Vikersund, if anybody built a bigger one in future Jussi can also include it later in a silent minute of his freetime :lol:

Re: type hill

Posted: 29 Apr 2011, 13:00
by Sven.S

Re: type hill

Posted: 29 Apr 2011, 13:20
by lukicabukica
probably not cause its too small, but maybe just maybe... it could be