The Official Deluxe Ski Jump Forum
https://www.mediamond.fi/forum/
The real Jussi:Severin wrote:Jussi KoskeIa
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 1
Location: Finland
My guess: fake account...
This is cheap ''Jussi'' : /Jussi KoskeIa wrote:Ok. In Beta 2 will be Vikersund.
I'm for Planica , it's cooler than Vikersund and youszymbar15 wrote:Four people are blind... O_o
I'd like Vikersund, jumping 260m! That would be real fun!
me too, i like jump on big hillsskiflyer11 wrote:i want all hills
amm... You know our jumpers said that in Planica its very hard to jump over the curve as in Vikersund is easyer. And also in planica they somekinda made the table more inclinedganjaman92 wrote:im really wondering if the fly curve in game in vikersund is as its in real, like 3 meters above the ground. Not like in planica where u have about 10 meters!
thats a good questionganjaman92 wrote:im really wondering if the fly curve in game in vikersund is as its in real, like 3 meters above the ground. Not like in planica where u have about 10 meters!
hey, i didnt mean this curve after take off. I was just talkin about the high of the flight. In vikersund they fly 3 meters above the ground, and in planica around 8-10 meters.lukicabukica wrote:amm... You know our jumpers said that in Planica its very hard to jump over the curve as in Vikersund is easyer. And also in planica they somekinda made the table more inclinedganjaman92 wrote:im really wondering if the fly curve in game in vikersund is as its in real, like 3 meters above the ground. Not like in planica where u have about 10 meters!
(before 10.8° now 11.5°) Franci Petek sait that it seems very small but its a very big change.
Before: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOcf42b5 ... re=related
Now: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/1/mqZbnsKhOZ4
But i still dont understand Damjan: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/6/4keR3fGxsQ0
ganjaman92 wrote:hey, i didnt mean this curve after take off. I was just talkin about the high of the flight. In vikersund they fly 3 meters above the ground, and in planica around 8-10 meters.lukicabukica wrote:amm... You know our jumpers said that in Planica its very hard to jump over the curve as in Vikersund is easyer. And also in planica they somekinda made the table more inclinedganjaman92 wrote:im really wondering if the fly curve in game in vikersund is as its in real, like 3 meters above the ground. Not like in planica where u have about 10 meters!
(before 10.8° now 11.5°) Franci Petek sait that it seems very small but its a very big change.
Before: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOcf42b5 ... re=related
Now: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/1/mqZbnsKhOZ4
But i still dont understand Damjan: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/6/4keR3fGxsQ0
And im wondering if in dsj4 we also gonna fly around 3 meters above the ground. That was my point.
maybe he had lots of backwind
And to damjans jump. What dont you understand? U mean that he "only" flew 220m? Well he didnt have the speed at the end so he fell down.
no i dont think he had backwind. ALso the commentary says he has a nice straight front wind. I think the problem here was that damjan set his skies too steep after take off. That made him going that high, but also it decelerated his speed.skiflyer11 wrote:ganjaman92 wrote:hey, i didnt mean this curve after take off. I was just talkin about the high of the flight. In vikersund they fly 3 meters above the ground, and in planica around 8-10 meters.lukicabukica wrote: amm... You know our jumpers said that in Planica its very hard to jump over the curve as in Vikersund is easyer. And also in planica they somekinda made the table more inclined
(before 10.8° now 11.5°) Franci Petek sait that it seems very small but its a very big change.
Before: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOcf42b5 ... re=related
Now: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/1/mqZbnsKhOZ4
But i still dont understand Damjan: http://www.youtube.com/user/TheDess20#p/u/6/4keR3fGxsQ0
And im wondering if in dsj4 we also gonna fly around 3 meters above the ground. That was my point.
maybe he had lots of backwind
And to damjans jump. What dont you understand? U mean that he "only" flew 220m? Well he didnt have the speed at the end so he fell down.
the wind compensation points were something like -21, and I think that what gamjaman ment was Damjan's very high flying trajectory, am I correct?ganjaman92 wrote:no i dont think he had backwind. ALso the commentary says he has a nice straight front wind. I think the problem here was that damjan set his skies too steep after take off. That made him going that high, but also it decelerated his speed.skiflyer11 wrote:ganjaman92 wrote: hey, i didnt mean this curve after take off. I was just talkin about the high of the flight. In vikersund they fly 3 meters above the ground, and in planica around 8-10 meters.
And im wondering if in dsj4 we also gonna fly around 3 meters above the ground. That was my point.
maybe he had lots of backwind
And to damjans jump. What dont you understand? U mean that he "only" flew 220m? Well he didnt have the speed at the end so he fell down.
yeah you're right. And at the end he is just "fallin down" to 220m because after the take off he lost too much speed.OlliT wrote:the wind compensation points were something like -21, and I think that what gamjaman ment was Damjan's very high flying trajectory, am I correct?ganjaman92 wrote:no i dont think he had backwind. ALso the commentary says he has a nice straight front wind. I think the problem here was that damjan set his skies too steep after take off. That made him going that high, but also it decelerated his speed.skiflyer11 wrote:
Exactly. Imagine if Kranjec or Schlierenzauer would've had those wind conditionsganjaman92 wrote:yeah you're right. And at the end he is just "fallin down" to 220m because after the take off he lost too much speed.OlliT wrote:the wind compensation points were something like -21, and I think that what gamjaman ment was Damjan's very high flying trajectory, am I correct?ganjaman92 wrote: no i dont think he had backwind. ALso the commentary says he has a nice straight front wind. I think the problem here was that damjan set his skies too steep after take off. That made him going that high, but also it decelerated his speed.
Uh, oh a WR???OlliT wrote:Exactly. Imagine if Kranjec or Schlierenzauer would've had those wind conditionsganjaman92 wrote:yeah you're right. And at the end he is just "fallin down" to 220m because after the take off he lost too much speed.OlliT wrote: the wind compensation points were something like -21, and I think that what gamjaman ment was Damjan's very high flying trajectory, am I correct?
