Page 2 of 3
Posted: 10 Mar 2011, 18:21
by J.MIRO
Maybe one HS 250 Aavasaksa in Finland? And only real hills.
Posted: 12 Mar 2011, 15:03
by lukicabukica
[quote="nexen84"]I would be extremaly happy if I have those:
[img]
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/8217/hillsx.png[/img]
domin23 presented those. The only change I would bring is in naming - if you have for example 2 hills in Oslo, name them as "Oslo Normal HS106" and "Oslo Large HS134".[/quote]
how did you do that?
Posted: 12 Mar 2011, 16:08
by nexen84
First, I want to thank all the voters. 83 votes so far is pretty cool.
@lukicabukica - I'm not sure, you must ask domin23. I believe he created a file named "oslo-something-NOR.hil", something like that. Cheers!
Posted: 12 Mar 2011, 16:45
by orsvend
Id like real+fictional. Who doesnt want to try a k350 hill?
Posted: 12 Mar 2011, 18:08
by bulwa11
I have no idea where to post this but I m getting crazy. I had a dream today in which I played dsj 4... It must have been beta 2 ir later because there was a k-185 hill. I jumped 215m
and there were markings after the hs line
Posted: 12 Mar 2011, 18:50
by lukicabukica
orsvend i dont
Posted: 12 Mar 2011, 22:15
by Zapper
Two were want more take-off not only or that two have added only
Posted: 14 Mar 2011, 16:04
by J.MIRO
NO,NO,NO! I don't want above 300m in DSJ4. At most Aavasaksa K225 HS 250 in Finland.
Aavasaksa is project flying hill under the roof. Unfortunately unsuccessful.
This film about Aavasaksa.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCEi9D-Tgp8
Posted: 14 Mar 2011, 18:30
by skiflyer11
omg this is the craziest and coolest ski jumping hill project ive ever seen
Posted: 14 Mar 2011, 18:45
by Katalonbar
SOME REAL + SOME FICTIONAL
Posted: 19 Mar 2011, 17:40
by alexander
I don't think using real hill names will be a problem at all.
regardless of this though, I don't think it important whether the names/hills are "real". what I want is *realistic* hills, not necessary *real* hills.
Posted: 19 Mar 2011, 20:12
by nexen84
alexander wrote:I don't think using real hill names will be a problem at all.
regardless of this though, I don't think it important whether the names/hills are "real". what I want is *realistic* hills, not necessary *real* hills.
What's the difference between real and realistic, apart from one being a noun and secon an adjective? If something is REAL that means it is REALISTIC when you're describing it. Don't act cool
Posted: 19 Mar 2011, 20:41
by alexander
that is wrong. "real" is both a noun and an adjective. "realistic" is a completely different adjective than "real". where something being real indicates that it is pertaining to the truth, something being realistic means that it is accurately represented.
so, real hills would mean actual hills from reality. realistic hills would mean hills that are similar to real world hills, but may very well be fictional.
Posted: 26 Mar 2011, 20:48
by Jmurzyn
Hi, I agree with the proposals Nexen 84 but still would like to see ga-pa K115 and Ramsau because they are fantastic hills. Thank you
PS: Sorry for my english
Posted: 26 Mar 2011, 21:31
by skiflyer11
i would like to see a hs250m hill and some smaller ones like hs50
