Deluxe Ski Jump Forum

The Official Deluxe Ski Jump Forum
It is currently 24 Jan 2021, 22:37

All times are UTC + 2 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 27 Feb 2010, 00:16 
Offline

Joined: 21 Feb 2008, 19:21
Posts: 88
Location: Helsinki
My only wish is that Serbia HS69 is the absolute minimum.

Already now it is almost better to fall in that hill to pass through with q* in a cup with a big amount of participants. In fact easier than jumping normally if you are a little unlucky with stylepoints. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 Feb 2010, 00:51 
Offline

Joined: 02 Feb 2009, 22:45
Posts: 348
Location: Finland
At least no more hills in online cup... 40 hills is enough. Maybe Jussi could do more hills to offline jumping, but in online cup we jump 40 hills.

_________________
Petri Kähkönen
My YouTube-channel (piano videos, for example my own compositions, arrangements etc.): http://www.youtube.com/user/BachJose -


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Mar 2010, 21:36 
Offline

Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 21:21
Posts: 31
Location: Poland
I, in turn, suggests that they are in some countries after 2 or more for example:
Russia (Kaliningrad) - HS 50
Poland (Wisla) - HS 240
Czech Republic (Planica) - HS 300

Also proposed:
Kosovo - HS 90
Portugal - HS 135
Liechtenstein - HS 245
Iceland (if not the country) - HS 75
South Africa - HS 200
Luxembourg - HS 30
Greece - HS 500
Azerbaijan - HS 150
F.Y.R Macedonia - HS 110
Turkey - HS 81

After that I support the majority of these proposals off. On the occasion of the increase suggests that the hill but this was more jumps in the demo version.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Mar 2010, 22:44 
Offline

Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 21:38
Posts: 385
Location: Finish "Manse"
Greece - HS 500 you must joking...

_________________
"When jump then jump , are it clear?
( Originall "When jump then jump" at by ... Julia Kykkaenen)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 18 Mar 2010, 23:00 
Offline

Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Posts: 549
Location: Finland
kisiel wrote:
I, in turn, suggests that they are in some countries after 2 or more for example:
Czech Republic (Planica) - HS 300
FAIL.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 19 Mar 2010, 19:26 
Offline

Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 21:21
Posts: 31
Location: Poland
And how do you assess the rest of the ideas for jumps ?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 19 Mar 2010, 23:22 
Offline

Joined: 14 Apr 2009, 17:14
Posts: 37
At least we now need a norwegian hill K215 :)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 20 Mar 2010, 00:01 
Offline

Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Posts: 549
Location: Finland
kisiel wrote:
And how do you assess the rest of the ideas for jumps ?
Heh.. I just mean, Planica is Slovenia, not Czech Republic :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 20 Mar 2010, 11:56 
Offline

Joined: 18 Mar 2010, 21:21
Posts: 31
Location: Poland
In that case, I apologize for this mistake - it is really Planica, Slovenia.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 06 Apr 2010, 00:49 
Offline

Joined: 04 Apr 2010, 16:29
Posts: 48
Man HS 500 is ridicolous, nooo way, even if it would be nice to jump at least 400 m.
I think that nepal stuff sounds great K270 HS298.... and I think there is no way to jump a HS40 if the jumping physics are not totally changed....at least HS60
and I think that it should be possible to create you skis with some structures (like wood ,mormor, steel) it would look awesome.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 28 May 2010, 18:09 
Offline

Joined: 27 May 2010, 22:14
Posts: 4
Here my list which i use:
- Brazil HS 72
- South Africa HS 188
- West Sahara HS-500
- Brazil HS 75

_________________
m3 card


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 30 May 2010, 21:06 
Offline

Joined: 07 Apr 2010, 16:18
Posts: 3
Location: Poland
Maybe Uzbekistan HS 45


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 30 May 2010, 22:01 
Offline

Joined: 18 May 2010, 13:24
Posts: 24
Location: Poland
And maybe Mars HS783,5? :roll:
I think there shouldn't be such hills as Argentina, Australia, Spain etc. because in these countries no one heard about ski jumping... I think that's a good idea to make 2 hills for one country.

_________________
Paweł Wlazło
DSJ3 TL: 7704.92m POR: 1390
DSJ4 B2 TL: 596.83m POR: 1298


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 31 May 2010, 22:23 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Posts: 2988
Location: Finland
pywy25 wrote:
And maybe Mars HS783,5? :roll:
I think there shouldn't be such hills as Argentina, Australia, Spain etc. because in these countries no one heard about ski jumping... I think that's a good idea to make 2 hills for one country.

Actually there is (or has been) at least one ski jumping hill in all of these countries.
http://www.skisprungschanzen.com/e_schanzen.htm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: 01 Jun 2010, 15:58 
Offline

Joined: 04 Apr 2010, 16:29
Posts: 48
One question for Jussi, will you keep the several hillsizes in DSJ4 or will all the hills totally be changed in graphic AND dates? (hillsize/k-point...)
greets


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 2 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group