http://www.speedyshare.com/448801627.html
I jumped below the point of a display HS distance 222M me, why?
Sorry my English is not good ;p
Skoczyłem poniżej punktu HS a wyświetliło mi 222metry, czemu?
Bug?
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 08 Feb 2007, 18:01
- Location: HOLLAND
I'll add one similar standing bug:
http://www.speedyshare.com/875113134.html
That one is barely 115 and measured at 120,07
The only reason I can see why these jumps are measured wrong is that the jumper makes a strange motion with the hand right after landing.
You can see it on Pasi's replay and maybe even more clear on my replay.
The WR line is at 120,94 in that jump and if you look at it frame by frame you can see that the motion seems to start at approximately 120m.
It would be nice to see your deleted NED108,64 Kjell if you'd like to share it. Also it would be interesting to see that 92,30 jump in UK if it follows the same pattern.[/b]
http://www.speedyshare.com/875113134.html
That one is barely 115 and measured at 120,07
The only reason I can see why these jumps are measured wrong is that the jumper makes a strange motion with the hand right after landing.
You can see it on Pasi's replay and maybe even more clear on my replay.
The WR line is at 120,94 in that jump and if you look at it frame by frame you can see that the motion seems to start at approximately 120m.
It would be nice to see your deleted NED108,64 Kjell if you'd like to share it. Also it would be interesting to see that 92,30 jump in UK if it follows the same pattern.[/b]
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: 14 Jan 2008, 18:34
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 08 Feb 2007, 18:01
- Location: HOLLAND
I have also a landig bug replay, but it's not a record.
In ISL, i landed at 270m, but the game showed 283m .
http://www.speedyshare.com/275700653.html
In ISL, i landed at 270m, but the game showed 283m .
http://www.speedyshare.com/275700653.html
My name is Sander, not RCA!!
-
- Posts: 418
- Joined: 14 Jan 2008, 18:34
mis wrote:Amenonkelsmerte wrote:Well. Its not possible to jump more then 90 there so it would seem highly unlikely that 92 is legit...mis wrote: Also it would be interesting to see that 92,30 jump in UK if it follows the same pattern.
But still I like that WR more than the 39 others
yeah. thats true. i like it alot more aswell. lol