Vikersund

Off-topic discussion & chatter.
Post Reply
dsj 4
Posts: 344
Joined: 27 Feb 2011, 21:39
Location: PL
Contact:

Vikersund

Post by dsj 4 »

Image
skiflyer11
Posts: 968
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 18:46
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Vikersund

Post by skiflyer11 »

where? :)
Image

That's gotta hurt (sorry Zmaster for that fake ;))
dsj 4
Posts: 344
Joined: 27 Feb 2011, 21:39
Location: PL
Contact:

Re: Vikersund

Post by dsj 4 »

skiflyer11 wrote:where? :)
ooops sorry do not this link.This is the this link: http://www.sport.pl/skoki/1,65074,97518 ... szcze.html
Image
skiflyer11
Posts: 968
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 18:46
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Vikersund

Post by skiflyer11 »

but if any article said that, its not true the HS stayed the same
Image

That's gotta hurt (sorry Zmaster for that fake ;))
dsj 4
Posts: 344
Joined: 27 Feb 2011, 21:39
Location: PL
Contact:

Re: Vikersund

Post by dsj 4 »

but modernization was subject threshold and landing of what hill extend a of five meters
Image
skiflyer11
Posts: 968
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 18:46
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Vikersund

Post by skiflyer11 »

dsj 4 wrote:but modernization was subject threshold and landing of what hill extend a of five meters
yes the profile of the underrun was improved but nothing more :)
Image

That's gotta hurt (sorry Zmaster for that fake ;))
dsj 4
Posts: 344
Joined: 27 Feb 2011, 21:39
Location: PL
Contact:

Re: Vikersund

Post by dsj 4 »

but the flight parabola will be greater and thus lengthen the jump for 5 meters
Image
skiflyer11
Posts: 968
Joined: 23 Feb 2011, 18:46
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Vikersund

Post by skiflyer11 »

we will see :D
Image

That's gotta hurt (sorry Zmaster for that fake ;))
Post Reply