Planica

Bugs in DSJ4.
SuperAdo111
Posts: 650
Joined: 22 Dec 2009, 22:32

Re: Planica

Post by SuperAdo111 »

KN i would say that,it's the point of planica,go down and then wind can raise you up and up
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3647
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Planica

Post by Jussi Koskela »

SuperAdo111 wrote:KN i would say that,it's the point of planica,go down and then wind can raise you up and up
Then the difference is the flying style, not the profile of the hill.
TPo
Posts: 549
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Location: Finland

Re: Planica

Post by TPo »

This is the core reason why historical/fictional hills are needed too, wink wink Jussi :wink:
Total Length: 5353.38 m // 7749.06 m // 1603.92 m
Total Length: 14706.36 m
--
Winner of Ski-Stars World Championships (large hill) // 2nd of Ski-Stars World Championships (team) // Winner of Ski-Stars DSJ2 Cup
kamelficker
Posts: 6
Joined: 20 Mar 2011, 20:50

Re: Planica

Post by kamelficker »

Jussi Koskela wrote:
SuperAdo111 wrote:KN i would say that,it's the point of planica,go down and then wind can raise you up and up
Then the difference is the flying style, not the profile of the hill.
It kinda is, yes. But still the flying curve is too high in my opinion since sometimes you fall down from 10m high and just cant land. Even at 180-200m where the hill should be very steep so it should be a problem to land even if you fall down sudenly from few meters. I've jumped the whole day yesterday just Planica. And i must say that the 225+ meters the landing is pretty real. The only thing I dont like is that you cant (at least i couldnt) jump 220+ with a lower flying curve and being a bit faster.
And another thing. If you look at planica.. it got lines above its HS as well. So the HS ( 215m) isnt the last line but its 225-230 ( not sure).
Zmaster
Moderator
Posts: 774
Joined: 08 Feb 2011, 11:20

Re: Planica

Post by Zmaster »

I can definitely jump 220-230m with relatively low flying curve if i really try to make it low.
Image
That's gotta hurt.
TPo
Posts: 549
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Location: Finland

Re: Planica

Post by TPo »

Zmaster wrote:I can definitely jump 220-230m with relatively low flying curve if i really try to make it low.
Also, the key for standing long jumps in Kulm is to do a bad jump with good wind (=low flying curve) :wink:
Total Length: 5353.38 m // 7749.06 m // 1603.92 m
Total Length: 14706.36 m
--
Winner of Ski-Stars World Championships (large hill) // 2nd of Ski-Stars World Championships (team) // Winner of Ski-Stars DSJ2 Cup
kamelficker
Posts: 6
Joined: 20 Mar 2011, 20:50

Re: Planica

Post by kamelficker »

Zmaster wrote:I can definitely jump 220-230m with relatively low flying curve if i really try to make it low.
Of course you can. But its really hard. You need the optimal balance of speed and how high you are. My longest jump with low flying curve was 225,5m but i had to do many tries to get there since it was very hard for me ( a lot harder then with higher curve). And since im speaking how it is for me i know everyone wont agree with me.
Bidox19
Posts: 18
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 13:53

Re: Planica

Post by Bidox19 »

kamelficker wrote:
Jussi Koskela wrote:
SuperAdo111 wrote: And another thing. If you look at planica.. it got lines above its HS as well. So the HS ( 215m) isnt the last line but its 225-230 ( not sure).
i very much agree with that! :)
Image
SuperAdo111
Posts: 650
Joined: 22 Dec 2009, 22:32

Re: Planica

Post by SuperAdo111 »

kamelficker wrote:If you look at planica.. it got lines above its HS as well. So the HS ( 215m) isnt the last line but its 225-230 ( not sure).
Oh yes,we forgot,Jussi should make it ;)
Pavlokox
Posts: 135
Joined: 02 Nov 2011, 14:13
Location: Katowice, Poland

Re: Planica

Post by Pavlokox »

The reason of this discussion about the Planica HS215 is:
Planica was refurbished in 2010, and most of people still are used to old Planica where jumpers could flying long on so low curve. No it is no longer possible. Planica's curve was changed (but not enlarged)
HVAC Engineer,
Senior Process Specialist with German at PwC
MattyPolz14
Posts: 184
Joined: 04 Apr 2012, 10:06
Location: Canada

Re: Planica

Post by MattyPolz14 »

SuperAdo111 wrote:a part when u takeoff (jumper too high) and part when u pass 150-60 meters (too high too) but i think u should make a hill (not inrun) longer but a player flying lower,near the ground..That's my thinking,do not know for you :)
edit* i say this because i want a game more real,do not want to be hater or something like that..
The flying curve in Planica is perfect. It is the exact same in real life. The Planica HS 215 was built in 1969. Older ski jumping hills are much more high flyers. I am a real ski jumper and I jump out of Calgary, Alberta, Canada and the hills there are a bit older and are much more high flyers. Look at the Vikersund HS 225 for example, it is a much newer hill and it is a much lower flyer. So I believe the flying curve in the Planica HS 215 in the game is very realistic to the Planica HS 215 in real life. I know in the real Planica HS 215 they changed the flying curve a bit in 2010, but they are getting ready to make it a K 250 for 2013. They want to make it so you can go over 300 on that hill.
Post Reply