Referee assessment in DSJ 4 Beta 2

[J_like_DSJ]

I do not know if somebody already talked about it (did not check, if so, sorry), but I noticed some inconsistency as to the judges' evaluations, suppose we jump there a jumper on the hill HS 138 - 113.5 telemark I will end up, in assessing DSJ judges are too high, because 19.5 from 5 judges is a slight exaggeration at such a distance, because if the jumper jumps so much in real competition, the judges take into account the fact that he flew not even to the point of the design and then give notes after a maximum of 18 points if the jumper lands telemark. And so I think it should be in the DSJ.

Example situation:



http://img30.otofotki.pl/obrazki/rw699_przyklad.PNG

Sorry for my English, but everything here was written, was translated by the dictionary: translate.google.com