HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Ideas and suggestions for improving DSJ4.

Hills in 1.5.0 version

Bischofshofen HS78
32
12%
Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS89
7
3%
Hinterzarten HS77
13
5%
Hinterzarten HS108
29
11%
Klingenthal HS140
48
18%
Kuopio HS100
4
1%
Lahti HS97
25
9%
Oslo HS106
33
12%
Park City HS100
4
1%
Park City HS134
35
13%
Pragelato HS106
1
0%
Pragelato HS140
26
10%
Sapporo HS100
10
4%
 
Total votes: 267

Rajmek1233
Posts: 901
Joined: 10 Apr 2011, 21:28

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Rajmek1233 »

Yes, but I don't ask for one thing a few times.
Jericho
Posts: 255
Joined: 19 Feb 2008, 14:35

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Jericho »

Rajmek1233 wrote:Yes, but I don't ask for one thing a few times.
I dont agree with you, It shows that the users here are interested in the game.. And isnt that a good thing?
Without users, no game.
So you, me, mod`s should see beyond some questions about the progress in this game..
Ski-Stars Summer grand prix Dsj4 champion 2012

Up the irons
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3655
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Jussi Koskela »

Ralph96 wrote:
Chabiker wrote:So please share some photos with us 8)
When will be the new screens, Jussi?
Screenshots come when the hills are finished. For Park City HS134 I still need 1-2 days. And Sunday is not a day!
Every hill is different, so it's impossible to know in advance when they will be finished.
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3655
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Jussi Koskela »

Tomorrow screenshot.
domi_deluxe
Posts: 304
Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 12:10
Location: Linz, Austria

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by domi_deluxe »

Jussi Koskela wrote:Tomorrow screenshot.
:mrgreen:
###fu**ing cheaters!!!###
Rajmek1233
Posts: 901
Joined: 10 Apr 2011, 21:28

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Rajmek1233 »

If you have enough time after making Park City HS100,make the easiest hill.

Kuopio HS100 same the Kuopio HS127
Lahti HS97 same the Lahti HS130
Ralph96
Posts: 35
Joined: 21 Feb 2013, 00:03
Location: Judenburg, Austria

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Ralph96 »

Nice news Jussi. And sorry for asking the same question a few times. :oops: :(
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3655
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Jussi Koskela »

Rajmek1233 wrote: Kuopio HS100 same the Kuopio HS127
Lahti HS97 same the Lahti HS130
They look quite different to me.
gotvas
Posts: 4
Joined: 30 Jan 2013, 21:55

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by gotvas »

No hope for a sollution to the Oberstorf and Oslo problem yet huh? I really would have loved seing those hills some where down the road of this winter, but understand the difficultness of making it look good. Really just wondered if anybody had thought of a sollution or if you still are looking in too it? Or have you given up on it?
alinjr
Posts: 13
Joined: 07 Apr 2012, 11:59

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by alinjr »

I play with F2 camera....for me will be no problem Oslo and Oberstdorf :-D
Martin Kafka
Posts: 516
Joined: 23 Jan 2007, 20:31
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Martin Kafka »

gotvas wrote:No hope for a sollution to the Oberstorf and Oslo problem yet huh? I really would have loved seing those hills some where down the road of this winter, but understand the difficultness of making it look good. Really just wondered if anybody had thought of a sollution or if you still are looking in too it? Or have you given up on it?
Many suggestions were made on this topic, but apparently, none of them was good enough or implementable.

When there's no (quick) workaround to a problematic part of a hill, why not omit it?
The wind protection barriers in Lahti and Harrachov were omitted, too.
I'm still not convinced that excluding those hills from the game is the only solution. At all.

As for the other candidates, I'd love to see the small/normal hills like Bischofshofen HS78, Hinterzarten HS77 and Lahti HS97/Ga-Pa HS89. Large and flying hills are very prevalent, so the focus should be on them now.
I still remember how lovely Serbia was in DSJ3!
... And I guess old Falun is not an option?
alinjr
Posts: 13
Joined: 07 Apr 2012, 11:59

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by alinjr »

Martin Kafka wrote:
gotvas wrote: ... And I guess old Falun is not an option?
Old Falun not beacause the old hill dont exist ....I think Jussi will create new Planica HS225 next year right ?
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3655
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Jussi Koskela »

Jussi Koskela wrote:Tomorrow screenshot.
http://www.mediamond.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=5477
hoppern98
Posts: 8
Joined: 05 Apr 2012, 12:10

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by hoppern98 »

Oslo K-95 HS-106
I want oslo! It is a funny hill to fly in! In real life:D and i think jussi will make it funnier to jump in that hill in DSJ!
Post Reply