Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

General discussion about DSJ4.

You want Holmenkollen HS134 hill with:

complete building
34
56%
partial building
12
20%
or partially transparent
15
25%
 
Total votes: 61

TheMrSkiBartek
Posts: 536
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 16:03

Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by TheMrSkiBartek »

If you want complete buliding of Holmenkollen HS134 ?

or partial buliding for jumping with F2 camera ?


Image
Last edited by TheMrSkiBartek on 01 Nov 2012, 18:38, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image
Bartek Palewicz
Posts: 1150
Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 15:48
Location: Poland

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by Bartek Palewicz »

TheMrSkiBartek wrote:If you want complete buliding of Holmenkollen HS134 ?
DO.

Ontopic: this hill would be nothing without this walls...
Image
Image
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3657
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by Jussi Koskela »

In DSJ3 even one infamous tree between the camera and the ski jumper was too much. ;)
TheMrSkiBartek
Posts: 536
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 16:03

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by TheMrSkiBartek »

Jussi Koskela wrote:In DSJ3 even one infamous tree between the camera and the ski jumper was too much. ;)
be quiet :) :PP

People will decide :D
Image
Image
BłażejStępniewski
Posts: 184
Joined: 17 Apr 2011, 17:29
Location: Poland

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by BłażejStępniewski »

TheMrSkiBartek wrote:
Jussi Koskela wrote:In DSJ3 even one infamous tree between the camera and the ski jumper was too much. ;)
be quiet :) :PP

People will decide :D
Humm? I think Jussi will decide.
I can't imagine jumping on F2 camera with this wall.
Image
Image

Polish records in Val di Fieme HS134, Zakopane HS134 and Villach.
Rajmek1233
Posts: 901
Joined: 10 Apr 2011, 21:28

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by Rajmek1233 »

Walls can be transparent,this is best way.!:)
mlody5
Posts: 1236
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 20:50
Location: Poland, Kielce
Contact:

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by mlody5 »

Walls should be transparent on F2/F12 ;)
nanucha
Posts: 57
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 17:15
Location: Poland, Warsaw
Contact:

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by nanucha »

mlody5 wrote:Walls should be transparent on F2/F12 ;)
it's a GOOD IDEA. It's the same for example in Harrachov, wind nets on HS 205 on the right side.
Souch details of hill could be bautifull !!!
From that day (20.02.1994) I LOVE ski jumping:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPKuWuP ... =spoon03jp
TheMrSkiBartek
Posts: 536
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 16:03

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by TheMrSkiBartek »

Comon people!!! Hallelujah!!!
:D
Image
Image
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3657
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by Jussi Koskela »

mlody5 wrote:Walls should be transparent on F2/F12 ;)
Partially transparent (fast moving) structures close to camera are very irritating to eye, too.
TheMrSkiBartek
Posts: 536
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 16:03

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by TheMrSkiBartek »

Jussi Koskela wrote:
mlody5 wrote:Walls should be transparent on F2/F12 ;)
Partially transparent (fast moving) structures close to camera are very irritating to eye, too.
also snowiness could be very irritating to eye ;>

I think that, we get used to partially transparent :)
Don't worry :)
Image
Image
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3657
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by Jussi Koskela »

TheMrSkiBartek wrote: also snowiness could be very irritating to eye ;>
That's quite different since the snow/water particles are very small and there's motion blur applied to it. Without motion blur it would look awful. Applying motion blur to other graphics is *much* more difficult and would use lots of GPU resources.
nanucha
Posts: 57
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 17:15
Location: Poland, Warsaw
Contact:

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by nanucha »

Jussi Koskela wrote:
mlody5 wrote:Walls should be transparent on F2/F12 ;)
Partially transparent (fast moving) structures close to camera are very irritating to eye, too.
but... if something is on the right side of hill - I think that 1% players use F12 - could BE?

Image
(Harrachov)
From that day (20.02.1994) I LOVE ski jumping:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPKuWuP ... =spoon03jp
TheMrSkiBartek
Posts: 536
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 16:03

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by TheMrSkiBartek »

Jussi :) ! I have idea!
In game there is a free camera, yes ?
So, you can make full building hill or transparent building hill !
YES !
Image
Image
Luk
Posts: 907
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 15:47
Location: Gliwice, Poland
Contact:

Re: Oslo - Holmenkollen HS134 hill (INQUIRY)

Post by Luk »

Complete building :wink:
TheMrSkiBartek wrote:Comon people!!! Hallelujah!!!
:D
COME ON, no comon.
Post Reply