Landing difficulty

General discussion about DSJ4.

In the next version landing should be...

as easy as in beta2
7
9%
as difficult as in full version
32
41%
a little bit easier - somewhere between beta 2 and fv
36
46%
I don't care
3
4%
 
Total votes: 78

TPo
Posts: 549
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Location: Finland

Re: Landing difficulty

Post by TPo »

skiflyer11 wrote:
domi_deluxe wrote:thx :wink:

are the lössels in this forum ?
well i dont know :)
Yes, they both are.
Total Length: 5353.38 m // 7749.06 m // 1603.92 m
Total Length: 14706.36 m
--
Winner of Ski-Stars World Championships (large hill) // 2nd of Ski-Stars World Championships (team) // Winner of Ski-Stars DSJ2 Cup
Tom2
Posts: 707
Joined: 24 Jul 2011, 14:02
Contact:

Re: Landing difficulty

Post by Tom2 »

I really don't like this landing. It MUST be a little/much easier, because if I can't land 195 in Bad Mitterndorf or 88 in Zakopane, that makes this game absurd. I'm so angry when I jump long and can't stand too, like this example - I work about rating 16 competitions, then one fall makes rating lots of minus points :/ It must be easier.

Greetings,
Tom
DSJ3 TL: 7755.36m (#39), peak: 1325 (#490)
DSJ4 TL: 3550.97m (#3), online: 3506.29m (#11), peak: 1942 (#5)

DSJ3 PB: 318.88m (#19)
DSJ4 PB: 242.88m (#2)
Juraszczy
Posts: 1
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 23:29

Re: Landing difficulty

Post by Juraszczy »

too difficult
domi_deluxe
Posts: 304
Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 12:10
Location: Linz, Austria

Re: Landing difficulty

Post by domi_deluxe »

today i had to play 3 hours to jump further than my pb (219,20).
after feeled and mostly felt 1000 jumps i could stand 219,80!!!
but its the most stupid thing with the landing!!!
###fu**ing cheaters!!!###
StLB
Posts: 1
Joined: 24 Mar 2012, 22:36

Re: Landing difficulty

Post by StLB »

its really possible to stand jumps above 205m (Bad Mittendorf) or 220m in Planica.
here my pb for some hills (ok,jumped in training ;))

Zakopane: 102.40m
Kuusamo: 154.50m
Bad Mitterndorf 214.93m
Planica: 234.75m

it's just like in real.life jumping: you have to keep the skies flat.if you fall down from a height of 9 or 10 meters you can stand it of course...
ps: how to convert .rpl? then i could show you what i mean
SuperAdo111
Posts: 650
Joined: 22 Dec 2009, 22:32

Re: Landing difficulty

Post by SuperAdo111 »

StLB i landed on 220,5 at Kulm and 240,5 at Planica,so it is just like in real :)
macmat
Posts: 92
Joined: 24 Jan 2011, 18:37
Location: Poland

Re: Landing difficulty

Post by macmat »

I don't understand why do you want the landing on Kulm to be easier. The area after 205-210 meters is very flat, much flatter than on other flying hills. Look at Schlierenzauer's 215,5m, or Morgenstern's 210,5m (they're both on YouTube). They had big problems with landing, and it was still 5/10 meters behind DSJ WR.

Nagiller was close, but notice the pressure on such a long distance was so big that his binding broke.
Gutek70
Posts: 42
Joined: 13 Mar 2011, 13:28
Location: Bielsko-Biała

Re: Landing difficulty

Post by Gutek70 »

The Kulm is frustrating especially land above 200 meters. On the other hills are ok!!!
Gram tylko online - I only play online!!!
Post Reply