Page 4 of 4
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:23
by skiflyer11
J.MIRO wrote:skiflyer11 wrote:lukicabukica wrote:ehm ehm...
I was not wrong "HS160..."
And it seems you like Copper Peak so...
You are obviously getting me!
no it is k160
No, this is K145 HS160. Go to wikipedia.
thats just wrong
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:27
by mazifin96
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:28
by mazifin96
''It is expected to be reopened for competition in the next 2 or 3 years.''
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:28
by lukicabukica
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:30
by skiflyer11
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:32
by lukicabukica
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:41
by J.MIRO
Because of reached here distances they rescheduled from K 170 to K 145. Of course Copper Peak.
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:43
by lukicabukica
@skiflyer11
are you on youtube???
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:44
by Thanatos
It doesn't matter if it has a construction point of 145 or 160 metres. By the rules it's still no ski flying.
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 21:55
by skiflyer11
lukicabukica wrote:@skiflyer11
are you on youtube???
yes why?
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 22:25
by pepsiman89
skiflyer11 wrote:lukicabukica wrote:@skiflyer11
are you on youtube???
yes why?
by any chance this
http://www.youtube.com/user/skiiflyer ?
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 22:32
by lukicabukica
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 22:34
by bulwa11
ok guys off to pm with this. This is a Beta 2 topic
Posted: 23 Mar 2011, 22:36
by skiflyer11
