My opinion of beta 2 :)

skiflyer11 · Post by **skiflyer11** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:23

J.MIRO wrote:
skiflyer11 wrote:
lukicabukica wrote:ehm ehm...
I was not wrong "HS160..."
And it seems you like Copper Peak so...
You are obviously getting me!
no it is k160
No, this is K145 HS160. Go to wikipedia.

thats just wrong

mazifin96 · Post by **mazifin96** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:27

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper_Peak

There K-point 150

mazifin96 · Post by **mazifin96** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:28

''It is expected to be reopened for competition in the next 2 or 3 years.''

lukicabukica · Post by **lukicabukica** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:28

http://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper_Peak

skiflyer11 · Post by **skiflyer11** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:30

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper_Peak

lukicabukica · Post by **lukicabukica** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:32

well its the same
but...
http://www.skisprungschanzen.com/EN/Ski ... pper+Peak/

J.MIRO · Post by **J.MIRO** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:41

Because of reached here distances they rescheduled from K 170 to K 145. Of course Copper Peak.

lukicabukica · Post by **lukicabukica** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:43

@skiflyer11
are you on youtube???

Thanatos · Post by **Thanatos** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:44

It doesn't matter if it has a construction point of 145 or 160 metres. By the rules it's still no ski flying.

skiflyer11 · Post by **skiflyer11** » 23 Mar 2011, 21:55

lukicabukica wrote:@skiflyer11
are you on youtube???

yes why?

pepsiman89 · Post by **pepsiman89** » 23 Mar 2011, 22:25

skiflyer11 wrote:
lukicabukica wrote:@skiflyer11
are you on youtube???
yes why?

by any chance this

http://www.youtube.com/user/skiiflyer ?

lukicabukica · Post by **lukicabukica** » 23 Mar 2011, 22:32

http://www.youtube.com/user/skiflying11
or this

Post by **bulwa11** » 23 Mar 2011, 22:34

ok guys off to pm with this. This is a Beta 2 topic

skiflyer11 · Post by **skiflyer11** » 23 Mar 2011, 22:36

lukicabukica wrote:http://www.youtube.com/user/skiflying11
or this

yes this is my channel