Deluxe Ski Jump Forum

What is better? 30 hills or 15 hills with real objects next to them?

So following your thinking: isn't better to have 60 fictitious hill? No, because game has real ones and they should be precisely copied.

Your game, your choice That was just my small opinion.

Jussi Koskela wrote:3. Higher system requirements
4. It would take extra time

Jussi, please be serious, everybody knows that DSJ4 optimization is jerky. I think you should work on it and not to post excuses like this one.

general it's not a bad idea with this meter rank but:

Jussi I think you should do the many trees on Engelberg

and:

I haven't included 1 meter distance markers because they look irritating to eye on fast sideways movement.

Jussi, have you even thought about adding to the DSJ4 "non-real" ski hills?
I'm not asking about near future because there is still a lot to do with real ones.

Next time use Google Translate, no offence, just quick tip for you and others

Klasyfikacja generalna Mistrzostw Polski po 2/10 konkursów (ostatni 2012-01-22) Poz. Gracz Kraj I II III Punkty 1. Jakub Kwiatkowski POL 9 3 2 180 2. Robert Struski POL 2 2 - 100 3. Tomasz Karciarz POL - 1 6 92 4. M. A. Lipinski POL - - - 80 5. Mateusz Greex POL 3 1 2 72 6. Piotr Kaczmarczyk POL 2 ...

I want to view only the results (=fast), we have got WR replays to see good jumps

my sugestion:
A | 1250/1300-9999
B | 1000-1250/1300
C | 0-1000

I've the same results like you Jussi

I've got some commands ideas (they are similar to Airio Tracker commands from LFS): /cpb - connected personal bests, shows all connected players PBs [with jump points], from farthest to the nearest /sb - session best, shows the furthest jumps of all the sessions played (Q,S1,S2) [with jump points], ...

raphael22 wrote:Good idea

Jussi Koskela wrote:Yesterday there were over 160 players in the Wednesday tournament and it was pretty difficult for many players to qualify even once, so I was
[*]Tournament B, open to players with rating less than 1000[/list]

What do think?

I suggest 1100

I agree with you.

radeksar1995 wrote:Only simulation can be enough for me

Thats 100% right, this is the absolute minimum, jumping opponents are just an option that may well occur later.

I think this way: in real world, too much forces (etc.) working on the jumper to introduce it to pc game. Its take a lot of time and skills from the dev., with one man thats hard way too much. We still have a very good sim game here, I hope the more pchysic will come with v1.1; so you will not have ...

I would love to see expanded online statistics, such as: total number of jumps, average jump distance, average note, average position, in general and for each hill.

You can also think about points punishment for exiting from the ongoing competition.