Just a visual rating idea.
Just a visual rating idea.
*Wait for the huge image to load*
SEE WHAT BECAME OUT OF ME?! xD
I just think it would be easier to compare ourselves...
Well, it's the real CPU rating in here...
I'm 12th in THIS World Cup... :>
SEE WHAT BECAME OUT OF ME?! xD
I just think it would be easier to compare ourselves...
Well, it's the real CPU rating in here...
I'm 12th in THIS World Cup... :>
If my jump is better in Kalle's, I'm just drunk...
If someone is able to do http://www.mediamond.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1157 , PM me please
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
This is possible, but what rating should we show in the overall cup stats? None? The average?
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
The rating on that hill, obviously. In that case, from the normal hill, but on Lahti, the Big hill one. And the third one for Planica and other Ski Flying hills.
If my jump is better in Kalle's, I'm just drunk...
If someone is able to do http://www.mediamond.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1157 , PM me please
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
I was referring to the cup stats (not the competition stats).szymbar15 wrote:The rating on that hill, obviously. In that case, from the normal hill, but on Lahti, the Big hill one. And the third one for Planica and other Ski Flying hills.
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
Ah, right. So I think average one should fit, like in Online, I remember there was one Ski Jumper (Jakub?) who was really great on Normal hills, but he had worse results on other hills and his rating was quite lower than me.
If my jump is better in Kalle's, I'm just drunk...
If someone is able to do http://www.mediamond.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1157 , PM me please
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
Or maybe even all of them could be showed like 1000/1050/1100 (if there's just enough space for that).
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
Oh, I'm sure it will be visible on 1920x1080, I recently bought new monitor, and as you can see there is lot of free space. Thanks for reading!
If my jump is better in Kalle's, I'm just drunk...
If someone is able to do http://www.mediamond.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1157 , PM me please
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
I'm still targeting 4:3 in the menus (my monitor is a good old 4:3 CRT! )
-
- Posts: 1150
- Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 15:48
- Location: Poland
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
Haha, i heard that the CRTs are showing colours much better than new LCDs, is that true?Jussi Koskela wrote:I'm still targeting 4:3 in the menus (my monitor is a good old 4:3 CRT! )
-
- Posts: 516
- Joined: 23 Jan 2007, 20:31
- Location: Czech Republic
- Contact:
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
I think this was true some 5-6 years ago. Today's modern LCDs are pretty good and comparable in terms of colour reproduction. I'm using an IPS panel and can't really complain. It also depends on calibration (if you do it). The default factory settings of newly bought monitor are usually not optimal.Dydux666 wrote:Haha, i heard that the CRTs are showing colours much better than new LCDs, is that true?
I already got used to the stretch, but still, adding 16:9 / 16:10 support also for menu would be nice.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
- Location: Finland
- Contact:
Re: Just a visual rating idea.
It's quite a lot of work to adapt the complete layout to different aspect ratios. Changing only the background images would be easier, though.Martin Kafka wrote: I already got used to the stretch, but still, adding 16:9 / 16:10 support also for menu would be nice.