System landing

Ideas and suggestions for improving DSJ4.

Do you want system landing from Beta 2 in one of next version DSJ 4?

yes
34
47%
no
39
53%
 
Total votes: 73

docencisko
Posts: 124
Joined: 14 Dec 2011, 02:05

System landing

Post by docencisko »

Many people are annoyed about current system landing.
What do you think about come back system landing from Beta 2?
Image
Image
TPo
Posts: 549
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Location: Finland

Re: System landing

Post by TPo »

No. Landing should be left like it is, I hated the unrealistic and super-easy beta2 landing.
Total Length: 5353.38 m // 7749.06 m // 1603.92 m
Total Length: 14706.36 m
--
Winner of Ski-Stars World Championships (large hill) // 2nd of Ski-Stars World Championships (team) // Winner of Ski-Stars DSJ2 Cup
Bartek Palewicz
Posts: 1150
Joined: 25 Mar 2011, 15:48
Location: Poland

Re: System landing

Post by Bartek Palewicz »

Now it is very good, like TPo said- it was too easy in beta 2.
Image
Image
Zmaster
Moderator
Posts: 774
Joined: 08 Feb 2011, 11:20

Re: System landing

Post by Zmaster »

There is now much more to think in your flying curves when you jump so you can land jumps. I like it a lot.
Image
That's gotta hurt.
Yahoo
Posts: 210
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 19:58

Re: System landing

Post by Yahoo »

Current system landing is very difficult. Jussi doesn't change this system even 90% of players select first option "yes" :(. Playability should be like in DSJ2, now it's worst than DSJ3... This game doesn't make fun, only nervousness after another unsuccessful landing in BM over 220 meters...
Image
greex1
Posts: 1625
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 22:36

Re: System landing

Post by greex1 »

Yahoo wrote:Current system landing is very difficult. Jussi doesn't change this system even 90% of players select first option "yes" :(. Playability should be like in DSJ2, now it's worst than DSJ3... This game doesn't make fun, only nervousness after another unsuccessful landing in BM over 220 meters...
I agree.

Vote = Yes.
DSJ4 Beta 2 - WR Total Lenght, WR Bad Mitterndorf HS200 and Zakopane HS94
Online World Cup 2011/2012 - World Cup A - 3rd position
Online World Cup 2012/2013 - Ski Flying A winner
Online 4HT 2013/2014 - World Cup A - 3rd position
mask
Posts: 799
Joined: 01 Oct 2009, 13:49
Location: Poland
Contact:

Re: System landing

Post by mask »

i voted for "yes"
Di Stefano
Posts: 734
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 18:07

Re: System landing

Post by Di Stefano »

I think now landing is close to perfect but in K-HS "Zone" this must will be only formality.
smolAREK
Posts: 676
Joined: 22 Apr 2011, 11:17
Location: Poland/Tarnow

Re: System landing

Post by smolAREK »

I voted for "no", current landing system is very, very good for me ;)
Image
Heel
Posts: 242
Joined: 11 Apr 2011, 23:05

Re: System landing

Post by Heel »

if will be possible technical, then i would older system landing...
Image
Image
SuperAdo111
Posts: 650
Joined: 22 Dec 2009, 22:32

Re: System landing

Post by SuperAdo111 »

landing totally okay,now when everybody adapted on it we should change? It will change records by 2-3 meters in Planica and Kulm and many others ,so definetly no (im very nervous because of it some day i lost 120 and one day i earn 150 because of landing,its funny like this ;) )
RobertKranjecFAN
Posts: 70
Joined: 21 Jan 2011, 18:05
Location: +46° 28' 38.32", +13° 43' 19.96"

Re: System landing

Post by RobertKranjecFAN »

I just to criticise this landing system a lot but now I get the point of its realism. I hope this system stays so I voted NO.
Image
pikuvava
Posts: 209
Joined: 06 Dec 2010, 17:21
Location: Finland,Suomi

Re: System landing

Post by pikuvava »

I bored to Dsj 4 because flight position is way too open , it should be more aggressive and landing is little bit too hard... so i changed to dsj3 there u can jump more aggressive and without that huge stress while playing dsj4 like = good wind and long jump and u try to not fall... and then u fall the record jump...that is really annoying. In dsj 3 u can jump just jump...
Why i like DSJ? Its Best SKI JUMP SIMULATOR EVER!
¨
Yahoo
Posts: 210
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 19:58

Re: System landing

Post by Yahoo »

hmm...
If Jussi doesn't change system landing he should change gate.

Sapporo wind max. gate 6
Gapa wind max. gate 7
Planica wind max. gate 13
Kulm wind max. gate-2
Zakopane wind max. gate 4
Villach wind max. gate 2
Kuusamo wind max. gate 1
Oberstdorf wind max. gate 11
Lahti wind max. gate 2
Lille wind max. gate 0

and then system landing doesn't be a problem. But then Jussi must delete all records.
Now gates are too high.
Image
Rajmek1233
Posts: 901
Joined: 10 Apr 2011, 21:28

Re: System landing

Post by Rajmek1233 »

Yahoo wrote: Sapporo wind max. gate 6
Gapa wind max. gate 7
Planica wind max. gate 13
Kulm wind max. gate-2
Zakopane wind max. gate 4
Villach wind max. gate 2
Kuusamo wind max. gate 1
Oberstdorf wind max. gate 11
Lahti wind max. gate 2
Lille wind max. gate 0
Kulm-Gate 1,0
Zakopane,Ober,Lahti now is good.
Post Reply