Page 2 of 2

Re: Ironwood hill

Posted: 26 Apr 2011, 18:13
by mlody5
J.MIRO wrote:
mlody5 wrote:I think in DSJ4 full version, of course, will be
Zakopane HS 134,
GaPa,
Bischoschofen,
Salt Lake City,
Vancouver Whistler,
Liberec,
and
Trondheim
Beta3 or full version?
Full Version, of course, and others hill, but I'm waiting for thiss hills :)

Re: Ironwood hill

Posted: 26 Apr 2011, 19:48
by kaka95
And how about hills which does't exist nowdays like old Ga-Pa K115? I'd like to see those hills in DSJ instead of every K120 :D

Re: Ironwood hill

Posted: 26 Apr 2011, 20:42
by skiflyer11
mlody5 wrote:I think in DSJ4 full version, of course, will be
Zakopane HS 134,
GaPa,
Bischoschofen,
Salt Lake City,
Vancouver Whistler,
Liberec,
and
Trondheim
why do you think like that? :wink:

Re: Ironwood hill

Posted: 08 May 2011, 03:44
by jkallinen
I voted yes, going to be visiting this hill this June while on vacation. Will be staying 6 miles down the road at Big Powderhorn Ski resort. Going to talk with
the operators if this hill will meet FIS standards to open for world cup competitions once again. Since they have not jumped on this hill since 1994. I visited
this hill the year after they closed to jumps. Was there in early Sept 95.

Re: Ironwood hill

Posted: 27 Jan 2012, 23:57
by J.MIRO
Ironwood is modernised! I sended some time ago e-mail to president of copper peak. He write that hill will be on two years modernized! To K170 HS185!

Re: Ironwood hill

Posted: 28 Jan 2012, 11:09
by Risen
Ironwood when it's renewed. Regular hills should come up first.

Re: Ironwood hill

Posted: 08 Apr 2012, 14:32
by 151kbar151
http://www.skisprungschanzen.com/EN/Ski ... pper+Peak/
There is take off angle and more useful things.