DSJ 4 1.0.1

General discussion about DSJ4.
Severin
Posts: 255
Joined: 25 Jan 2007, 20:36

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by Severin »

@ Mario

You could just take the interval from flight to landing and increase the speed of the jumpers movements if it's a longer way the jumper has to go...

In reality the different jumpers don't need longer for the landing although there are different flying style...
Image
doubleffect
Posts: 52
Joined: 08 Mar 2009, 06:56
Location: Poland

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by doubleffect »

Something is wrong with both flying hills. The jumper is very high before landing when the gate is high and/or the wind is strong at 180 degrees. And the jumper then starts flipping back or simply falls because a player has to land being still too high. Very often in aforementioned conditions even if position is good before landing, there is no chance of landing without falling. No idea how people land over 230m...
DSJ3 Personal best: 314.0m (Slovenia)
DSJ4 Personal best: 196.5m (Planica) (what a great jump that was!...)
KrilanPL
Posts: 3
Joined: 11 Jan 2012, 17:44

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by KrilanPL »

Hmmm i bought pre-order many months ago, i played at beta only few days... today i found info about relase... where are hills ? I can see just few of them ? its bug ? Or only 8 hills in game ?
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3660
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by Jussi Koskela »

KrilanPL wrote:Hmmm i bought pre-order many months ago, i played at beta only few days... today i found info about relase... where are hills ? I can see just few of them ? its bug ? Or only 8 hills in game ?
It's not a bug, it's the *first* version of the game.
Ralph K.
Moderator
Posts: 235
Joined: 15 Apr 2008, 15:56

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by Ralph K. »

Any hints, guys, for landing at Kulm?

I stopped counting failed +218 jumps.

These are the three most frustrating, including one possible WR.

http://www.sendspace.com/filegroup/5itM ... VRbJJYwFLf

What am I doing wrong?
Image
doubleffect
Posts: 52
Joined: 08 Mar 2009, 06:56
Location: Poland

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by doubleffect »

I can't help you because I can't land anything over HS either on Bad Mitterdorf hill. :x

Different tack. Why are there only 8 hills? why is it hard to create hills for DSJ4? Is it because of working on details so the hills resemble the real ones? Or is it the implemented physics?
DSJ3 Personal best: 314.0m (Slovenia)
DSJ4 Personal best: 196.5m (Planica) (what a great jump that was!...)
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3660
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by Jussi Koskela »

doubleffect wrote:Different tack. Why are there only 8 hills? why is it hard to create hills for DSJ4? Is it because of working on details so the hills resemble the real ones? Or is it the implemented physics?
First reason is the correct one. It takes about 5 days to create one hill.
Di Stefano
Posts: 734
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 18:07

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by Di Stefano »

So, why you working 8 months to make 8 hills ?? If really is takes about 5 days, in DSJ 4 1.0.1 should be about 30 Hills.
Austrian_Skijumpfan_94
Posts: 716
Joined: 28 Mar 2011, 11:18
Location: Austria

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by Austrian_Skijumpfan_94 »

I think Planica is your master work
The other hills are very good but in Bad Mitterndorf we all fly too far
TPo
Posts: 549
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Location: Finland

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by TPo »

Di Stefano wrote:So, why you working 8 months to make 8 hills ?? If really is takes about 5 days, in DSJ 4 1.0.1 should be about 30 Hills.
Yeah, and the physics just create themselves? :roll:
Total Length: 5353.38 m // 7749.06 m // 1603.92 m
Total Length: 14706.36 m
--
Winner of Ski-Stars World Championships (large hill) // 2nd of Ski-Stars World Championships (team) // Winner of Ski-Stars DSJ2 Cup
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3660
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by Jussi Koskela »

Di Stefano wrote:So, why you working 8 months to make 8 hills ?? If really is takes about 5 days, in DSJ 4 1.0.1 should be about 30 Hills.
Because: http://www.mediamond.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3529
:wink:
Di Stefano
Posts: 734
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 18:07

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by Di Stefano »

Jussi Koskela wrote:
Di Stefano wrote:So, why you working 8 months to make 8 hills ?? If really is takes about 5 days, in DSJ 4 1.0.1 should be about 30 Hills.
Because: http://www.mediamond.fi/forum/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=3529
:wink:
sorry, master, i know you make a lot of change in this game, Now I expect new hills, I hope you make about 2 hills for month
Severin
Posts: 255
Joined: 25 Jan 2007, 20:36

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by Severin »

Austrian_Skijumpfan_94 wrote:I think Planica is your master work
The other hills are very good but in Bad Mitterndorf we all fly too far

Yeah, but it was the same with Italy in DSJ 2.1, and it was part of the fun :)

So I like it the way it is!
Image
greex1
Posts: 1625
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 22:36

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by greex1 »

The BM is definitely flying too far. A lot of players exceeds the actual record (215.5 m), and nobody Planica.
DSJ4 Beta 2 - WR Total Lenght, WR Bad Mitterndorf HS200 and Zakopane HS94
Online World Cup 2011/2012 - World Cup A - 3rd position
Online World Cup 2012/2013 - Ski Flying A winner
Online 4HT 2013/2014 - World Cup A - 3rd position
TPo
Posts: 549
Joined: 12 Jan 2010, 20:15
Location: Finland

Re: DSJ 4 1.0.1

Post by TPo »

greex1 wrote:The BM is definitely flying too far. A lot of players exceeds the actual record (215.5 m), and nobody Planica.
The hill is fun because of that :wink: The RL record in Planica is propably the longest jump we'll ever see from that hill before the next enlargement, but in Kulm Nagiller showed years ago its possible to fly longer (and almost landed!).
Total Length: 5353.38 m // 7749.06 m // 1603.92 m
Total Length: 14706.36 m
--
Winner of Ski-Stars World Championships (large hill) // 2nd of Ski-Stars World Championships (team) // Winner of Ski-Stars DSJ2 Cup
Post Reply