HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Ideas and suggestions for improving DSJ4.

Which hill would you like to see in a February/March release ? (choose 3)

Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS89
18
5%
Hinterzarten HS77
17
5%
Hinterzarten HS108
55
15%
Kuopio HS100
9
2%
Lahti HS97
33
9%
Oberstdorf HS137 (tower omitted)
97
27%
Oslo HS106
54
15%
Pragelato HS106
7
2%
Pragelato HS140
53
14%
Sapporo HS100
23
6%
 
Total votes: 366

maftei.alin
Posts: 95
Joined: 19 Nov 2013, 16:33

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by maftei.alin »

Planica HS139 and HS105.
151kbar151
Posts: 78
Joined: 27 Jan 2011, 19:15

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by 151kbar151 »

Ok I've voted but I really wan't to see: Vikersund HS225, Oberstdorf HS 137, Innsbruck HS 130 (finally complete 4-hills tournament) and Iron Mountain.
Last edited by 151kbar151 on 22 Nov 2013, 18:33, edited 2 times in total.
151kbar151
Posts: 78
Joined: 27 Jan 2011, 19:15

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by 151kbar151 »

Why tower ommited in Oberstdorf? That's like Willingen or Klingenthal whitout tower!
maftei.alin
Posts: 95
Joined: 19 Nov 2013, 16:33

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by maftei.alin »

http://www.skisprungschanzen.com/EN/Ski ... hang/0391/

PyeongChang HS140 will host Olympic games in 2018...very nice hill.
Rid
Posts: 137
Joined: 08 Jul 2012, 15:22

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by Rid »

I'd like to see Rena hills(K99 HS111 and K124 HS139), Rasnov(K90 HS100 and K64 HS71), Einsiedeln(K105 HS117 and K70 HS77), Muju(K90 HS101 and K120 HS133).
These hills have unique sizes.
uli
Posts: 7
Joined: 11 Feb 2011, 16:33

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by uli »

as we have olympic hills in lillehammer and park city, both hakuba, pragelato and whistler hills would be nice
BartiSkiJumper
Posts: 856
Joined: 22 Dec 2011, 00:24
Location: Wrocław, Poland

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by BartiSkiJumper »

Now i can vote. Oberstdorf, and both Pragelato, and Oslo & Hinterzarten 108. But this will change with new permissions, because there is only hill which i want for the most (Obe)
Bartek Winczaszek:
DSJ3 TL - 7850.57m #1
DSJ4 TL - 3543.26m #6
DSJ4 Online Peak: 1959 #1
TDD 2013-2020: #2 - #3 - #2 - #2 - #1 - #2 - #1 - #1

My YT and Twitch channels: youtube.com/user/BartiSkiJumper - twitch.tv/BartiDSJ
takahara1987
Posts: 28
Joined: 26 Nov 2013, 02:33

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by takahara1987 »

My list of missing hills

1 Oslo HS134 :!:
2 Vikersund HS225 :!:
3 Innsbruck HS130 :!:
4 Oberstdorf HS137 :!:
5 Hakuba HS131 :!:
6 Liberec HS134
7 Trondheim HS140
8 Courchevel HS132
9 Almaty HS140
10 Pragelato HS140
11 Iron Mountain HS133
12 Titisee-Neustadt HS142
13 Vancouver HS140
maftei.alin
Posts: 95
Joined: 19 Nov 2013, 16:33

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by maftei.alin »

Will be nice to see hills from country which doont have a hill in the game ...
Kazakstan : Almaty HS140 (Very nice hill)
France : Courchevel HS132 (Nice profile)
Turkey : Erzurum HS140 (UFO hill my opinion)
Sweden : Falun hills ( I think will be in next version because Jussi have permission :) )
Slovenia : Kranj HS109 and Planica hills ( Slovenia dont have a hill in this game beacause Letalnica dont exist now :( )
Estonia : Otepaa HS100
Koreea : Pyeongchang hills ( will host olympic games)
Romania : Rasnov HS100 (Hill from my country will be awesome to see in this game)
Russia : Sochi hills (Will be hard :) )
Canada : Vancouver hills :)

So Jussi you have got any new permission ? :)
EgyLynx
Posts: 425
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 21:38
Location: Finish "Manse"

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by EgyLynx »

Rajmek1233 wrote:and Lahti HS97 is history.
but is only lowed bite.. ?
...Selection in progress...
mati777
Posts: 59
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 10:42
Location: Busko-Zdrój, Poland

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by mati777 »

Ga-Pa, Lahti and Obersdorf.
I ♥ Bad Mitterndorf & Ga-Pa.
MattyPolz14
Posts: 184
Joined: 04 Apr 2012, 10:06
Location: Canada

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by MattyPolz14 »

I think Jussi should try getting permissions for Calgary HS95, Calgary HS67, Vancouver HS140 and Vancouver HS106. I know the people who own the hills and I don't think that Jussi will have too much trouble getting the permissions. It will add more hills to the list of hills with permissions, the list is getting shorter and this will help. I'm saying the Calgary Hills because they were used in the 1988 Olympics, however tey have been heavily updated. (It might be difficult to get the hill info for the new 90 because we have rebuilt it this summer. However I can probably get the info from the people who designed it and I can take detailed photos of the jumps because I go there pretty much every day to jump myself. The 60 was not in the Olympics but it is a really cool small hill because it is a high flyer. The HS122 is not used anymore. And of course the Whistler hills were used in the 2010 Olympics and they are really cool hills.
Rajmek1233
Posts: 901
Joined: 10 Apr 2011, 21:28

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by Rajmek1233 »

Hills from this World cup.
Titisee-Neustadt HS142
Oberstdorf HS137
Innsbruck HS130
Trondheim HS140
Oslo HS134
Planica HS139
and
Vikersund HS225
domi_deluxe
Posts: 304
Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 12:10
Location: Linz, Austria

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by domi_deluxe »

Rajmek1233 wrote:Hills from this World cup.
Titisee-Neustadt HS142
Oberstdorf HS137
Innsbruck HS130
Trondheim HS140
Oslo HS134
Planica HS139
and
Vikersund HS225
:D i like
###fu**ing cheaters!!!###
CalinStelistu
Posts: 215
Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 23:00
Location: Romania>>Neamt>>Piatra Neamt
Contact:

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.6

Post by CalinStelistu »

Planica HS139 Harrachov HS142 Innsbruck HS130
Image
Post Reply