HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Ideas and suggestions for improving DSJ4.

Hills in 1.5.0 version

Bischofshofen HS78
32
12%
Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS89
7
3%
Hinterzarten HS77
13
5%
Hinterzarten HS108
29
11%
Klingenthal HS140
48
18%
Kuopio HS100
4
1%
Lahti HS97
25
9%
Oslo HS106
33
12%
Park City HS100
4
1%
Park City HS134
35
13%
Pragelato HS106
1
0%
Pragelato HS140
26
10%
Sapporo HS100
10
4%
 
Total votes: 267

Szymon11
Posts: 853
Joined: 17 Dec 2011, 17:03
Location: Tilburg, The Netherlands

HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Szymon11 »

"Jussi Koskela wrote:
Here's the list of remaining hills that I have been able to get permissions for:


Bischofshofen HS78
Falun HS106 (under construction)
Falun HS134 (under construction)
Garmisch-Partenkirchen HS89
Hinterzarten HS77
Hinterzarten HS108
Klingenthal HS140
Kuopio HS100
Lahti HS97
Oberstdorf HS137 (view blocked)
Oslo HS106
Oslo HS134 (view blocked)
Park City HS100
Park City HS134
Pragelato HS106
Pragelato HS140
Sapporo HS100"

Please choose three hills what in your opinion must be in 1.5 version.
Peak: 1835
Total length offline: 3535.16 m
Total length online: 3500.20 m
Former online world record holder: Wisła.
Former offline world record holder in Oberstdorf! First jumper ever who broke and stood 230 meters barrier!
alinjr
Posts: 13
Joined: 07 Apr 2012, 11:59

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by alinjr »

Jussi Planica HS139 Bloudkova Velikanka you have permission?
piekarzinho
Posts: 8
Joined: 23 Sep 2013, 14:20

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by piekarzinho »

Park City HS134
Hinterzarten HS108
Klingenthal HS140
Rajmek1233
Posts: 901
Joined: 10 Apr 2011, 21:28

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Rajmek1233 »

Bischofshofen HS78
Klingenthal HS140
Pragelato HS140
Szymon11
Posts: 853
Joined: 17 Dec 2011, 17:03
Location: Tilburg, The Netherlands

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Szymon11 »

Lahti HS 97
Klingenthal HS 140
Park City HS 134
Peak: 1835
Total length offline: 3535.16 m
Total length online: 3500.20 m
Former online world record holder: Wisła.
Former offline world record holder in Oberstdorf! First jumper ever who broke and stood 230 meters barrier!
domi_deluxe
Posts: 304
Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 12:10
Location: Linz, Austria

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by domi_deluxe »

i don't like small hills - so i chose the 3 "big" ones:

Klingenthal
Park City
Pragelato
###fu**ing cheaters!!!###
J.MIRO
Posts: 850
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 11:16
Location: POLAND

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by J.MIRO »

So Klinghental for 100% in next version, than Park City HS134 and Hinterzarten HS108, maybe Bischofshofen HS78. For me - not bad.
smolarkus
Posts: 80
Joined: 21 Mar 2011, 21:48

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by smolarkus »

We have 11 large hills, I want more small hills.
Bischofshofen HS78, Lahti HS97, Sapporo HS100
Image
Image
MattyPolz14
Posts: 184
Joined: 04 Apr 2012, 10:06
Location: Canada

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by MattyPolz14 »

PLEASE PARK CITY HILLS!!!!! I jump them all the time in real life and would love to have them in the game. Also Jussi, if you make them, could you please design te summer plastic like in real life? (see below)
http://www.panoramio.com/m/photo/2844458
Tonio94
Posts: 49
Joined: 15 Aug 2009, 15:08

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Tonio94 »

And don't you want guys GaPa with its special and recognizable green tower?
Pertti Sarka
Posts: 51
Joined: 14 Feb 2007, 14:29
Location: Finland

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Pertti Sarka »

domi_deluxe wrote:i don't like small hills - so i chose the 3 "big" ones:

Klingenthal
Park City
Pragelato
X2
Image
EgyLynx
Posts: 425
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 21:38
Location: Finish "Manse"

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by EgyLynx »

Prageleto nh and Kuopio nh not voted eyet?
...Selection in progress...
J.MIRO
Posts: 850
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 11:16
Location: POLAND

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by J.MIRO »

In my opinion DSJ4 needs more non-european hills and hills wnich have old, not regular profile. Thats why I voted for Lahti HS97, Park City HS134 and Sapporo HS100.
MattyPolz14
Posts: 184
Joined: 04 Apr 2012, 10:06
Location: Canada

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by MattyPolz14 »

J.MIRO wrote:In my opinion DSJ4 needs more non-european hills and hills wnich have old, not regular profile. Thats why I voted for Lahti HS97, Park City HS134 and Sapporo HS100.
Park City HS134 is regular profile, I mean it may be 11 years old but it is still regular profile.
Pavlokox
Posts: 135
Joined: 02 Nov 2011, 14:13
Location: Katowice, Poland

Re: HILLS PRIORITY FOR 1.5.0

Post by Pavlokox »

Great :) I just wanted to make the same pole :)

I chose:
Hinterzarten HS77 - it would be the smallest one
Klingenthal HS140 - it is important and nice
Kuopio HS100 - it has an interesting profile
HVAC Engineer,
Senior Process Specialist with German at PwC
Post Reply