Presentation of CPU players' results

Ideas and suggestions for improving DSJ4.
Post Reply

How should the CPU players' results be presented

All at once with no delay
37
43%
One by one with a small delay between the jumps (for example 10 jumps per second)
38
44%
One by one after clicking 'Continue'
10
12%
Something different (e.g. click 'Continue' for the 3 best)
1
1%
 
Total votes: 86

Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3655
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by Jussi Koskela »

Please vote and comment. This can be configurable, too.
domi_deluxe
Posts: 304
Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 12:10
Location: Linz, Austria

Re: Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by domi_deluxe »

i think "all at once with no delay" is the best thing

but ...

it would be more interesting, if we could also click a second time before the top10 jumps ...
###fu**ing cheaters!!!###
BłażejStępniewski
Posts: 184
Joined: 17 Apr 2011, 17:29
Location: Poland

Re: Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by BłażejStępniewski »

I thought about first two, but for me, the first is a little better option.
Image
Image

Polish records in Val di Fieme HS134, Zakopane HS134 and Villach.
Rajmek1233
Posts: 901
Joined: 10 Apr 2011, 21:28

Re: Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by Rajmek1233 »

At first I didn't understand and vote for option 2.
I will vote for option 1
Austrian_Skijumpfan_94
Posts: 716
Joined: 28 Mar 2011, 11:18
Location: Austria

Re: Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by Austrian_Skijumpfan_94 »

First two options please if it´s possible
Luk
Posts: 907
Joined: 09 Apr 2011, 15:47
Location: Gliwice, Poland
Contact:

Re: Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by Luk »

All at once with no delay.
J.MIRO
Posts: 850
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 11:16
Location: POLAND

Re: Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by J.MIRO »

All at once with no delay.
I understand, that CPU is ready?
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3655
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by Jussi Koskela »

Thanks for the feedback. Looks like the best option is to include an adjustable delay (0-1000 ms).
Heel
Posts: 242
Joined: 11 Apr 2011, 23:05

Re: Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by Heel »

yes, first option is best no doubt
Image
Image
Jussi Koskela
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3655
Joined: 22 Jan 2007, 14:42
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Presentation of CPU players' results

Post by Jussi Koskela »

Tip: You can adjust the delay at World Cup -> Settings (and Team Cup -> Settings).
Post Reply