name hill

mario123456783 · Post by **mario123456783** » 26 Mar 2011, 17:17

I think the hill should be called like this:

Lillehammer K-123
Lahti K-116

called a point of K and not HS

skiflyer11 · Post by **skiflyer11** » 26 Mar 2011, 17:22

mario123456783 wrote:I think the hill should be called like this:

Lillehammer K-123
Lahti K-116

called a point of K and not HS

no i do not agree the k-point is much older and you can better compare the hills with the hillsize

Skoczek12 · Post by **Skoczek12** » 26 Mar 2011, 18:53

Best:

Lillehammer HS138 (K123)
Lahti HS130 (K116)

skiflyer11 · Post by **skiflyer11** » 26 Mar 2011, 20:28

Skoczek12 wrote:Best:

Lillehammer HS138 (K123)
Lahti HS130 (K116)

No i think lillehammer hs138 is enough

J.MIRO · Post by **J.MIRO** » 26 Mar 2011, 22:56

Lillehammer HS138
Zakopane HS134
Vikersund HS225
better than:
Lillehammer K123
Zakopane K120
Vikersund K195

mario123m · Post by **mario123m** » 26 Mar 2011, 23:25

I think this should be switchable in options. K or HS.

I also prefer K.

skiflyer11 · Post by **skiflyer11** » 27 Mar 2011, 11:55

J.MIRO wrote:Lillehammer HS138
Zakopane HS134
Vikersund HS225
better than:
Lillehammer K123
Zakopane K120
Vikersund K195

much better

Basadoni · Post by **Basadoni** » 27 Mar 2011, 12:01

It must be HS. It`s up to date.

Dan Ionescu · Post by **Dan Ionescu** » 27 Mar 2011, 13:07

I like K point much more than HS measurement... I'm sad they switched to HS.

pepsiman89 · Post by **pepsiman89** » 27 Mar 2011, 14:27

so you would rather have
Kuopio K120
Kuusamo K120
even though the HS's are 127 and 142? its better to have the HS shown and not K point, that way we can easily determine which hill is bigger etc...

it would suck if ti woudl look like this:

Courchevel K120
Oberhof K120
Predazzo K120
Sapporo K120
Liberec K120
you wouldnt know which hill to pick -.-

skiflyer11 · Post by **skiflyer11** » 27 Mar 2011, 14:30

pepsiman89 wrote:so you would rather have
Kuopio K120
Kuusamo K120
even though the HS's are 127 and 142? its better to have the HS shown and not K point, that way we can easily determine which hill is bigger etc...

it would suck if ti woudl look like this:

Courchevel K120
Oberhof K120
Predazzo K120
Sapporo K120
Liberec K120
you wouldnt know which hill to pick -.-

i totally agree

Marekb · Post by **Marekb** » 27 Mar 2011, 15:58

the best is point K and HS

skiflyer11 · Post by **skiflyer11** » 27 Mar 2011, 16:11

Marekb wrote:the best is point K and HS

no just the HS is enough

Post by **alexander** » 27 Mar 2011, 20:28

mario123m wrote:I think this should be switchable in options. K or HS. I also prefer K.

always go for customisation. that's the easiest way of satisfying everyone.

Post by **bulwa11** » 27 Mar 2011, 20:42

HS is better. Why ? Because there is a lot of K-120 hills out there but it turns out that on some its possible to jump 130 meters maximum and on others 145 meters. So K-120 doesnt really tell that much about a hill. The new HS shows us the real possibilities of jumping on that hill

Deluxe Ski Jump Forum

name hill

name hill

Re: name hill