Discussion about new Hills

General discussion about DSJ4.

Which hills do you wish most for v1.4.0

Poll ended at 22 Feb 2013, 15:47

Sapporo HS100
1
2%
Oberstdorf HS137
4
7%
Oberstdorf HS106
0
No votes
Bischofshofen HS140
10
18%
Lahti HS97
1
2%
Erzurum HS109
0
No votes
Erzurum HS140
0
No votes
Liberec HS134
1
2%
Liberec HS100
0
No votes
Trondheim HS140
2
4%
Trondheim HS105
0
No votes
Innsbruck HS130
3
5%
Harrachov HS142
0
No votes
Titisee-Neustadt HS142
2
4%
Oslo HS134
3
5%
Hakuba HS131
3
5%
Park City HS134
2
4%
Park City HS100
0
No votes
Falun HS124
1
2%
Wisla HS134
4
7%
Courchevel HS132
0
No votes
Chamonix HS105
0
No votes
Thunder Bay HS136
1
2%
Whistler HS140
1
2%
Stams HS117
0
No votes
Einsiedeln HS117
2
4%
Kranj HS109
2
4%
Iron Mountain HS133
6
11%
Yabuli HS140
1
2%
Hinterzarten HS108
0
No votes
Klingenthal HS140
2
4%
Hakuba HS98
0
No votes
Calgary HS95
1
2%
Karpacz HS94
0
No votes
Szczryk HS106
2
4%
 
Total votes: 55

Jakob_PL
Posts: 18
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 16:59

Discussion about new Hills

Post by Jakob_PL »

I think, in next version there will be Lahti HS97, Sapporo HS100 and Oberstdorf HS137.
Reason: Every Time, a new Large Hill (or in case of Oberstdorf Flying Hill) was released, later the normal Hill was implemented. Or other way round. i think its right, or why would the Lahti-Guys or the Sapporo-Buddies said that Jussi can make the Large Hill but not the Normal Hill?? Same with Oberstdorf. Or Garmisch. or...or...or...

Here you can Discuss about this

PS: i just took Large Hills and Normal hills in the question bcause its boring with the Vikersund here, Vikersund there...
J.MIRO
Posts: 850
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 11:16
Location: POLAND

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by J.MIRO »

As you can see Jussi, new hills are most needed. Nothing more than this.
L57
Posts: 175
Joined: 13 Apr 2012, 01:00

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by L57 »

Bischofshofen HS140 I BET THIS ONE WILL BE IN 1.4.0 (ENGELBERG WAS in 1.3 AS I SUSSPECTED)
maybe OBERSTDORF 137, INNSBRUCK HS130 , TRONDEHEIM 140, KLINGENTHAL 140
About 4,5 hills max.
Di Stefano
Posts: 734
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 18:07

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by Di Stefano »

Vikersund!
Maciejo-96
Posts: 1654
Joined: 17 Aug 2012, 13:34
Contact:

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by Maciejo-96 »

Planica HS139.
Join me on my Twitch streams:
https://www.twitch.tv/mathijsen
mlody5
Posts: 1236
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 20:50
Location: Poland, Kielce
Contact:

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by mlody5 »

Ćertak 205 ;)
Jakob_PL
Posts: 18
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 16:59

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by Jakob_PL »

Guys, i already said, this is a Topic JUST ABOUT Large & Normal Hills. I don't want to hear anything about Vikersund or Harrachov
BartiSkiJumper
Posts: 856
Joined: 22 Dec 2011, 00:24
Location: Wrocław, Poland

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by BartiSkiJumper »

Jakob_PL wrote:Guys, i already said, this is a Topic JUST ABOUT Large & Normal Hills. I don't want to hear anything about Vikersund or Harrachov
But maybe we want a flying hills, you are not most important.
Harrachov HS205, Vikersund HS 225 and 117, all 4HT hills, Oslo 134, Planica 139 and IRON MOUNTAIN!
Bartek Winczaszek:
DSJ3 TL - 7850.57m #1
DSJ4 TL - 3543.26m #6
DSJ4 Online Peak: 1959 #1
TDD 2013-2020: #2 - #3 - #2 - #2 - #1 - #2 - #1 - #1

My YT and Twitch channels: youtube.com/user/BartiSkiJumper - twitch.tv/BartiDSJ
ziga106
Posts: 6
Joined: 20 Jan 2013, 13:21

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by ziga106 »

VIKERSUND H225 and Harrachov HS205
Image
fabian1993
Posts: 24
Joined: 30 Nov 2012, 20:52

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by fabian1993 »

Harrachov HS205 and Vikersund HS225 !!!
tikozan
Posts: 3
Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 20:51

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by tikozan »

The missing hills from the 4HT.
Jakob_PL
Posts: 18
Joined: 03 Dec 2012, 16:59

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by Jakob_PL »

BartiSkiJumper wrote:
Jakob_PL wrote:Guys, i already said, this is a Topic JUST ABOUT Large & Normal Hills. I don't want to hear anything about Vikersund or Harrachov
But maybe we want a flying hills, you are not most important.
But i already said, THIS is a topic WITHOUT Flying Hills. Please Respect my descission that here is just with Large hills or Normal Hills
SuperAdo111
Posts: 650
Joined: 22 Dec 2009, 22:32

Re: Discussion about new Hills

Post by SuperAdo111 »

Oslo,definetly...
Post Reply